I have nothing helpful. Just saying that my bf walked in on me listening to the explanation for this and now thinks the LSAT is so rigid and all encompassing, that it also tests on the behavior or monkeys and their predators.

It's too early for you to be considering this when you have not taken the November LSAT yet.

Take it, and see how you feel about it. When I take a prep text with accommodations time, I always do like 5 points better at least.

If you take it, and still feel you may have done poorly, then consider taking the January LSAT. However, rember you still can't guarantee a better score in January....plus your applications will be later.

I feel like the best course of action would be to apply as soon as your November LSAT scores are in. Otherwise they will be later, but only possibly with a better score. So you would be trading the actual benefits of an earlier app for hypothetical benefits.

Does that make sense? Potentially if you wait, you could be turning in a late January app with a score that's not even improved.

A lot of his explanation for why AC A is wrong is irrelevant. We KNOW tht pre-1980 cars create 30% of local [pollution because that's in the statement. So, it doesnt matter what percent of them are driven or not.

Choosing this one would require denying stats in the statement that we have to take as true because that's how the LSAT works. If we assumed every stated facts would be lies, the whole test would be bedlam lol

Ugh. I didn't like any of these answers but I didn't focus on the question being "the MOST support". not "DEFINITIVE support".

I chose B because I over thought the details of "El Corrido de Kiansis" (c. 1870) being the OLDEST COMPLETE corrido, yet the beginning said they had been around since 1836....so to me that implied all corridos between 1836-1869 were incomplete so maybe that supported the statement in B....that most were not complete. I don't think LSAT questions ever rely on that level of tricky numerical detail though, so I should've known it was wrong.

I didn't like C because of the extreme language of "ALL corridos"....yet technically "SOME lines in COMMON" is not extreme because in common doesnt neccessarily mean the exact same, but the text references "ready made lines" and "relies heavily in familiar language."

If I would've focused on the use of "importantly" in the text, it should've been a cue that C was correct. There is most support for C.