You ever come back to a question on blind review and wish you could smack yourself for choosing such a non-supported answer...smh what was past me thinking?!?!

These answer choices are so funny

100% agree!! I would really like to see how the instructors tackle more subtle arguments / answer choices beyond the scope of what the question stem is asking.

Dang. After 10 minutes at looking at this question I realize that there was a difference between the data being studied by the Airport Admin (pilot diaries) and the critics (air traffic footage). On inital and BR, I really thought I understood the gap, that being that just because the critics are only using partial review of the same data doesn't mean its wrong? but that is completely off base. If you are struggling with this question after reading it multiple times, I would try and break down exactly what each party is refering to when making their argument.

This is a tough question. But if you take a step back you can really appreciate just how much they can pack into a single question with every word in that in the LSAT you can discover new pieces of information / assumptions after 10 minutes when looking at a question. I was genuinely shocked it was AC A at first but after sitting with it, A is the clear correct answer. I was playing checkers and LSAT writers are playing 4D chess.

premise had me in a blender, but revisiting it a day later ts is actually simple and easy to understand. Got it wrong because I thought that the "has this aim" refered to "a legitimate artistic aim" and not arousal of anger. I am also personally not a huge fan of diagraming here. To me just finding the gap in makes it so I know the correct AC has to include intervention in the world and beauty --> preferable in that works that anger/intervention don't care about beauty. Even if I messed up the conditional diagraming I know its either c or d and c is rather silly.