Look for what the author is advocating.

The second paragraph points out that this is what the author is basing this entry on.

Make sure to follow the perspectives.

A= author's perspective

B= Don't know anything about that

C= Don't know anything about that

D= Recent?

E= Only thing mentioned in that sentence

LSAC every once in a while: "I hate you all, and f*** you"

not completely undermining is still undermining

BECAUSE SOME CELLS ARE PROGRAMMED TO DIE...

Got it wrong since I was trying to "move quick" and decided to not read E. Wrong move. ALWAYS READ THE ANSWER CHOICES :)

Yes! Using this method and then highlighting the strong language makes me fly through the answer choices even when I am a bit stuck.

Got it right, but hated the use of the word "drastic". The highlight method instead of using the AC cross-out really helped since I highlighted the strong language that made the others wrong.

I WAS GOING TO CHOOOSE IT

@Daisy228 Sounds good to me

I would love to possibly join!

NOOOOO I unchose B in a panic frenzy. Stick with your gut!

pain.

I ended up choosing E to the language of "any". I thought, "well if it all that said all, then this would be the answer. It didn't so I chose E.

I am in basically the same boat. My strategy is to anchor myself back to the lessons and I have been reading many science and opinion articles daily, then acting as if was a RC passage. This gets my working memory, makes my WPM read go up, and gets the structure baked into my head. I realized that I have been score chasing without putting in the work right when I had a basic understanding of each concept.

Reschedule for a later one and get a tutor if needed!!

Hello, I would love an hour of your time as soon as your available to consult with where I am at.

@ConqueringLSAT Pseudo sufficient makes the claim more likely to occur. For Sufficient assumption, there is a logical gap that needs to be filled to guarantee the conclusion.

West coast. It would be cool to meet some faces over zoom.

@LSAT175 I tripped up on it, and I have been trying to get better at completely understanding my mistakes to the point where I could teach them, haha. So the reason is that it says And Prehistoric marine reptiles. So it is taking care of both sections, previous and current. Since it mentions the prehistoric, that means that just because these reptiles had porous bones does not mean that they are deep divers. I got baited in choosing D because I assumed that the absence of evidence meant that it was right. We need clear evidence to prove something right or wrong.

@kimwexler Just noticed the name lol

@kimwexler Law and former econ major, switched to business admin so I didn't have to take as many credits. I often talk about the law of diminishing returns since it is so applicable haha

@DrewArnopolin A future lawyer made this joke

Thanks :)

@stephb8 It wants you to focus on getting them right, but I see it as how much I am going to need to reel it in when the test comes along