went back and forth so many time swith my answer choice because i thought we needed to compare the two things we were doing CBA to but i trusted my gut!!!
Could we say that A should be eliminated just through sheer redundancy? I'm not sure I understood the stim completely, but I thought that AC A was just repeating the information stated here: "[colored paper] readily permits a repeated use of exactly the same color in different compositions."
AGAIN IM STUCK BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND WRONG ANSWER IN LAST 2!!!! I NEGATE BOTH AND THEY BOTH WOULD MAKE THE ARGUMENT NOT WORK D AND A. THIS IS PISSING ME OFF NOW. EVERY SINGLE TRY NOW IN THIS SECTION I'VE BEEN LIKE THIS . I HATE NA. FAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I ruled D out immediately because I thought they were trying to trick me by placing a SA AC to try to trick me to not pick the NA. What the heck I'm so mad
This has been by far the hardest question type so far. I am just not undertsanding. Every answer choice looks really good. Can someone break this down for me in a different way maybe?
I'm not confident at all when I chose an answer. I also notice that when I try the negation method, I manipulate myself into thinking the negation works. Does anyone have any tips/tricks they have?
i feel like i get these wrong just because I dont read properly. I only read the stim once and dont go back to it when comparing the responses. so frustrating.
I'm so confused, how is it an assumption that "allowing for a precise comparison of that color's impact" is a positive if the beginning of that sentence is "colored paper is preferable because"? Why would a reason that something is preferable not be a positive?
Relatedly, how is saying "interfering with the pure effect of the color" is bad an assumption if the whole point of that sentence is contrasting paint to colored paper which was already stated to be preferable to paint?
I know this is self explanatory but I hate how I get it wrong on the first try but then the blind review I actually can think and I get it, how do we get that right answer quicker
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
109 comments
went back and forth so many time swith my answer choice because i thought we needed to compare the two things we were doing CBA to but i trusted my gut!!!
Sooo... is the reasoning here cost-benefit? I approached it that way...but didn't clock the prescriptive/descriptive gap it seems
How is this one much easier than the last one 😭
Could we say that A should be eliminated just through sheer redundancy? I'm not sure I understood the stim completely, but I thought that AC A was just repeating the information stated here: "[colored paper] readily permits a repeated use of exactly the same color in different compositions."
I love reading these comments. Joint suffering is so real lol
AGAIN IM STUCK BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND WRONG ANSWER IN LAST 2!!!! I NEGATE BOTH AND THEY BOTH WOULD MAKE THE ARGUMENT NOT WORK D AND A. THIS IS PISSING ME OFF NOW. EVERY SINGLE TRY NOW IN THIS SECTION I'VE BEEN LIKE THIS . I HATE NA. FAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I ruled D out immediately because I thought they were trying to trick me by placing a SA AC to try to trick me to not pick the NA. What the heck I'm so mad
I hate this section sooo much!
I think here it assumes teachers want to teach students in a way that helps them. This however, wasn't stated, but obviously necessary.
Oh i suck at these omg
The only reason I got this one right is that A said "even if they are of different textures" and that seems to contradict the stem.
This has been by far the hardest question type so far. I am just not undertsanding. Every answer choice looks really good. Can someone break this down for me in a different way maybe?
I was doing so good and now im flopping so bad help
I got D but was stuck on A... I get why A is wrong but can someone else help to explain it?
I'm not confident at all when I chose an answer. I also notice that when I try the negation method, I manipulate myself into thinking the negation works. Does anyone have any tips/tricks they have?
Omg I finally got one right I thought it would never happen
took two minutes but got it. poe has been a godsend for these NA questions.
how are these harder questions easier than the lower difficulty ones???
this section is an L
All my homies hate Necessary Assumptions
i feel like i get these wrong just because I dont read properly. I only read the stim once and dont go back to it when comparing the responses. so frustrating.
#feedback in the description for answer choice C, it starts with "You go this right"
does anyone know how many NA questions are usually in the LSAT
I'm so confused, how is it an assumption that "allowing for a precise comparison of that color's impact" is a positive if the beginning of that sentence is "colored paper is preferable because"? Why would a reason that something is preferable not be a positive?
Relatedly, how is saying "interfering with the pure effect of the color" is bad an assumption if the whole point of that sentence is contrasting paint to colored paper which was already stated to be preferable to paint?
I know this is self explanatory but I hate how I get it wrong on the first try but then the blind review I actually can think and I get it, how do we get that right answer quicker