there's just a really specific missing link. Write out the premises and see how one of them fits into the conclusion/puzzle

the words became another language, got it right but took 15 minutes

This is the first question that I found to not make any sense. Idek what any of it meant

5/5 to finish the day. Gonna muck some sush(i) like the champion I am.

I spent an hour on this one question and I realized that any time the explanatory chain between A and C is broken by B not being related to A or C, that strengthens or weakens the argument.

@kurapika i got 5/5 and fistbumped the old man sitting next to me at the library

@LuisCortez-Garcia just keep a set of flash cards with the concept of the question that u get wrong and write the question, the type, and the reason why the answer u chose was wrong and why the correct answer is correct.

@AliLazim I like this sentence this is helpful, thanks

I can do this, the problem is that it takes 10 minutes per question

For 4, if ur tryna fly by putting on a racc suit, you better be an Italian Plumber! Even some of the Italian Plumbers in Racc suits may be unable to fly.

Maybe this will help: If Kumar is 17 mins late, he qualifies to be marked late, but he has only landed himself in the necessary condition/superset/big circle, not confirmed to be in the subset/sufficient

For the "all too many weaklings are fools" i got it wrong but realized after that "all too many" means at least one. One could be too many.

would b be wrong because the first part of the ethicist's claim that only when we know A LOT abut the pre events and b contradicts it because it says that it doesn't matter how much info we have?

I love learning