Self-study
Hi all, I am working on making a switch to a new career. I'd love to be in touch with other "non-traditional" students to share our unique experience. Is there such a group already?
KatiaMiles
- Joined
- Oct 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 168
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
KatiaMiles
Monday, Apr 13
I added everyone interested to the chat. Please let me know if you were not able to connect. Thank you for your interest!
KatiaMiles
Tuesday, Mar 31
I agree that an automatic fluid update would be awesome. If I fell behind for whatever reason, it would be great if my schedule could adjust to my actual speed, so I don't have to restructure the whole program each time. Or is there an easy way to do that I am not aware of?
KatiaMiles
Monday, Mar 2
@JO_Odera I did not go with B for the same reason - the stimulus states "each... member... only... selfish reasons." That did not match in my view with "not ALL... members possess," which implies that some do. The stimulus clearly stated that ALL members possessed a different property.
Thank you for sharing your explanatory afterthought. I don't know if that is sufficient though. Management is still "staff" - just with a different function. (At least that's what Google says - of course, Google knows it all and best :) If that is for debate - what "staff" is - then the stimulus should have differentiated various lines of staff, but it clearly said - "EACH staff member." I would like to propose addressing this nuance in the explanatory video because there are at least some students who tripped on this one.
KatiaMiles
Saturday, Dec 27, 2025
@rjon27 Thank you much! I'll keep this great example in mind next time I try my assumptions :)
KatiaMiles
Wednesday, Dec 10, 2025
@MnM that brings me back to my original note :) Overall, I agree that A is a stronger assumption, but they could have written it better.
KatiaMiles
Tuesday, Dec 9, 2025
@MnM Alright, thank you. Though "not abandoning" might as well mean "getting away with crime" - where does it say that by the time the owners noticed... the thieves were gone with the cars. I am not convinced.
KatiaMiles
Saturday, Dec 6, 2025
A was based on assumptions, but B offered the same weight of assumptions. The way I understood B was: car alarms deterred a number of thefts altogether (hence, the number of thefts declined), yet people ignoring those alarms enabled the completion of actual thefts. Kinda like stealing Louvre jewels in the middle of a day... Aren't those valid assumptions?
@suhyahn, thank you for the tip. I appreciate you sharing this!