How much does it matter if I include "because" and "for" in my premise selections? For example, in some of the skill builders right before this, when the answer was revealed, they did not highlight the word "because" as part of the premise, but rather left it completely unhighlighted. In this skill builder, when the answer is revealed, they are including "because" and "for" in what they are saying the premise is. Is there a reason for that, or does it kind of not matter if you include those words.

After reading the explanation, I am a little confused and will go and watch the video. My first thought confusing me though, is that what if coffee is a highly elastic good? What if the coffee shop increases the price for the coffee at the same rate as the increase in price of beans, keeping the margin the exact same. If coffee is a highly elastic good, that means that with changes in price, demand and consumption doesn't change much. So what if that margin stays the same and people don't actually start buying less coffee? That would mean that profit would stay around the same, or at least it COULD. I know we're supposed to take the statement of "or its coffee sales will decrease" as true, but why do we assume that? It may not be the case and seems to open it up to more incorrect assumptions. I mean imagine your favorite coffee shop increased it's coffee prices by 75 cents to make up for higher priced beans, would you really buy less? Maybe, but maybe not.

Im planning on taking the LSAT in October, about how many modules/hours a day or week should I aim to do?