I dont understand how if people are 'less objective' regarding matters which they possess extensive knowledge on rather than ones they do not, how would that mean that they are not objective about either? Wouldn't this imply that they are at least a little bit objective about at least the subject which they do not possess extensive knowledge? Thanks.
@taylorstryker objective as a term can be used as an descriptor (objective/not objective) or a comparative (more/less objective). It appears the author has just mixed these uses up. The example is just trying to show that the relative is not an absolute, i.e. even if they're "more objective" about subjects they know less about, they're still "extremely less objective" than a different person would be
@Hanifa No, "Tom’s recipe for lasagna is easy to follow for most people" is an absolute statement, not a comparative one. [1]
It describes a general state or quality ("is easy") and its intended audience ("for most people") without making a comparison to another specific recipe, method, or standard. [1]
A comparative statement would explicitly contrast the recipe against something else, using structures like "-er than" or "more... than" (e.g., "Tom’s lasagna recipe is easier to follow than Mary’s recipe" or "Tom's recipe is more straightforward than traditional ones"
Had a hard time with this once it provided the Absolute example.
Absolute means universally objective, true or a fact; Vs a relative claim which introduces conditions and things that can change based on the reader.
I think the attempt was to make absolute statements into comparatives. But there is nothing to compare. Ex:
Tom's recipe takes X steps and Y time. (This is absolute)(Premise)
Tom's recipe is easy (Argument)(Conclusion) for most people to follow.
The difficulty I was having is that if you take off the first sentence (the absolute claim) the rest is all subject or relative. Tom's recipe is easy to follow? Compared to what/who?
Maybe in the context of comparatives, absolute is the wrong term? Or maybe "easy" is the wrong word?
After writing this and looking at "Let's review", I see the lesson is "Don't confuse comparatives with absolute claims". the misunderstanding may come from forgetting that, and getting stuck on a subjective word like easy.
TLDR; IMO the easiest way to clarify is to change:
"Conversely, you don't want to confuse an absolute claim for a relative one.
Absolute Claim Example:"
TO
Conversely, you don't want to confuse an absolute claim for a relative one that is implying absolute qualities.
@NoraElkhyati When something is "absolute", you have a clear, straightforward answer/outcome, with no room for an alternative possibility. When something is "relative", it's more vague and has more than one possible answer. Think of "absolute" like math, where there is only one correct answer (1+1 will always equal 2), and "relative" as something broad, or allowing for more than one possibility, like ELA/writing, where many perspectives can be true as long as they are supported. I really hope this helps :)
Its relative because Tom is only taller than Athena he can still be considered short. Saying "Tom is tall" is saying he is tall and not short. I had to play this lesson twice to fully understand this one.
Relative claims compare without making absolute statements. Absolute claims make standalone statements without comparisons. The LSAT traps you by converting one into the other.
I'm confused for the objective example, how can we say that it is possible for them to be not objective at all when we are using language like "less" and "more?"
I understand this lesson but I dont understand how the last example is a comparative sentence at all. In previous lessons the teacher mentioned that, implied or not, there are two things being compared. If the last example says "Tom's recipe for lasagna is easy to follow", I understand how that is absolute but I do not understand how its comparative sentence. There isn't even an implied "than" in that sentence. So, I am having a hard time thinking of an absolute example for comparative sentences. Are not all comparative sentences relative? As it is being compared to another thing (hence the "than" or implied "than")?
In both cases, you can reasonably infer Tom is tall. However, with the absolute claim, you know that because it simply states what Tom is, in and of himself. For the relative, you only know how tall Tom is in relation to a tree. If I took out the object of relation, it would just be "Tom is taller", which would not mean anything without the object of comparison.
Hello, can someone please help me understand for the example of "Tom's recipe for lasagna..." why there is an option that it could be "...harder than most other recipes"?? I dont understand how that is stated/implied in the comparative. Thank you
99 comments
Eve has a newer car than Adam
Eve’s car is newer than Adam’s, but this doesn’t mean it’s objectively new. His car could be a 1998 and hers is a 2006 in the year 2026.
are all relative claims comparatives
I dont understand how if people are 'less objective' regarding matters which they possess extensive knowledge on rather than ones they do not, how would that mean that they are not objective about either? Wouldn't this imply that they are at least a little bit objective about at least the subject which they do not possess extensive knowledge? Thanks.
@taylorstryker objective as a term can be used as an descriptor (objective/not objective) or a comparative (more/less objective). It appears the author has just mixed these uses up. The example is just trying to show that the relative is not an absolute, i.e. even if they're "more objective" about subjects they know less about, they're still "extremely less objective" than a different person would be
simplest way to understand imo:
Relative = compared to something else
Absolute = true on its own without comparison
@SwagOD Thank you! Thats a great way to put it, I got kinda confused on this section.
Is this still a comparative statement? and if yes, how?
Tom’s recipe for lasagna is easy to follow for most people.
@Hanifa it is a comparative imo. Because 'most people' imply that there's a subset of people that are NOT most.
@Hanifa No, "Tom’s recipe for lasagna is easy to follow for most people" is an absolute statement, not a comparative one. [1]
It describes a general state or quality ("is easy") and its intended audience ("for most people") without making a comparison to another specific recipe, method, or standard. [1]
A comparative statement would explicitly contrast the recipe against something else, using structures like "-er than" or "more... than" (e.g., "Tom’s lasagna recipe is easier to follow than Mary’s recipe" or "Tom's recipe is more straightforward than traditional ones"
Had a hard time with this once it provided the Absolute example.
Absolute means universally objective, true or a fact; Vs a relative claim which introduces conditions and things that can change based on the reader.
I think the attempt was to make absolute statements into comparatives. But there is nothing to compare. Ex:
Tom's recipe takes X steps and Y time. (This is absolute)(Premise)
Tom's recipe is easy (Argument)(Conclusion) for most people to follow.
The difficulty I was having is that if you take off the first sentence (the absolute claim) the rest is all subject or relative. Tom's recipe is easy to follow? Compared to what/who?
Maybe in the context of comparatives, absolute is the wrong term? Or maybe "easy" is the wrong word?
After writing this and looking at "Let's review", I see the lesson is "Don't confuse comparatives with absolute claims". the misunderstanding may come from forgetting that, and getting stuck on a subjective word like easy.
TLDR; IMO the easiest way to clarify is to change:
"Conversely, you don't want to confuse an absolute claim for a relative one.
Absolute Claim Example:"
TO
Conversely, you don't want to confuse an absolute claim for a relative one that is implying absolute qualities.
("Absolute Claim") Relative Claim implying absolute qualities Example:
Whew...
Does the phrase "tend to" make a claim relative rather than absolute?
This is such a bad explanation.
@JacksonStephens if you can explain better I am all ears honestly
Relative: Most people find that the Chloe Paddington is bulkier than some other luxury bags.
Absolute: Parmigiano Reggiano has a greater amount and higher-quality protein than any other cheese on the planet.
im so confused on the difference between relative and absolute. what are the basic definitions?
@NoraElkhyati When something is "absolute", you have a clear, straightforward answer/outcome, with no room for an alternative possibility. When something is "relative", it's more vague and has more than one possible answer. Think of "absolute" like math, where there is only one correct answer (1+1 will always equal 2), and "relative" as something broad, or allowing for more than one possibility, like ELA/writing, where many perspectives can be true as long as they are supported. I really hope this helps :)
@Cee🦋 I like this explanation!
@Cee🦋 Thank you! This made so much sense.
Yikes
This was not a good way to explain it but the show goes on
Tom is tall - Absolute
Tom is taller than Athena-Relative
Its relative because Tom is only taller than Athena he can still be considered short. Saying "Tom is tall" is saying he is tall and not short. I had to play this lesson twice to fully understand this one.
I asked CHATGPT to explain this:
"Tom’s recipe for lasagna is easy to follow for most people."
this sentence is about people, not about other recipes.
It means:
More than half of people find Tom’s recipe easy to follow.
Now look at the second sentence:
This is a comparison among recipes,
not people.The two classic LSAT mistakes
Mistake 1: Turning relative into absolute
“X is better than Y” → “X is good”
Mistake 2: Turning absolute into relative
“X is easy” → “X is easier than others”
Relative claims compare without making absolute statements. Absolute claims make standalone statements without comparisons. The LSAT traps you by converting one into the other.
I thought these lessons were going to help me understand the lsat ...but I feel way less prepared than when I was reading the lsat textbook lol fml
@GraceArciniega Which textbook were you using? And whcih did you find to end up being more beneficial? This or textbook? Thanks
i'm tired
@JohnThorn lmboooooooooooo.same.
I'm confused for the objective example, how can we say that it is possible for them to be not objective at all when we are using language like "less" and "more?"
Tom's recipe is easy to follow for most people ; Tom's recipe is easy to follow for the majority of people (<50%) as opposed to the minority of people
A- Identify the entities being compared: majority of people vs non-majority of people.
B- Identify the thing being compared on: the easiness of Tom's recipe to follow for people
C- Identify the winner: Most people can follow Tom's recipe
I understand this lesson but I dont understand how the last example is a comparative sentence at all. In previous lessons the teacher mentioned that, implied or not, there are two things being compared. If the last example says "Tom's recipe for lasagna is easy to follow", I understand how that is absolute but I do not understand how its comparative sentence. There isn't even an implied "than" in that sentence. So, I am having a hard time thinking of an absolute example for comparative sentences. Are not all comparative sentences relative? As it is being compared to another thing (hence the "than" or implied "than")?
is there a formula for these? im lost
@KayleeMurray
Tom is tall - Absolute
Tom is taller than a tree - Relative
In both cases, you can reasonably infer Tom is tall. However, with the absolute claim, you know that because it simply states what Tom is, in and of himself. For the relative, you only know how tall Tom is in relation to a tree. If I took out the object of relation, it would just be "Tom is taller", which would not mean anything without the object of comparison.
Hello, can someone please help me understand for the example of "Tom's recipe for lasagna..." why there is an option that it could be "...harder than most other recipes"?? I dont understand how that is stated/implied in the comparative. Thank you
@MWise Because most other recipes could be easier to follow for most people, or easier to follow for everyone.
If something is X, only because of its relation to something else, then it's relative.
If something is X, regardless of anything else then it's absolute.
This explanation is kind of confusing, here is an easier way to look at it:
If something is X, only because of its relation to something else, then it's relative.
If something is X, regardless of anything else then it's absolute.
@rylie5lynn hell yeah