This made sense to me! I even noticed while I was doing the contrapositive for one of them how it didn't make ANY sense and corrected myself before looking! LOVE that it's actually clicking!

Hi! I work from 8:30-4:30 in-person M-F as a legal secretary. I do my best to wake up around 6am every day to give myself time to be active in the morning, spend some time devoted to my faith, and get ready for my day ahead. If I have down time at work then I will drill and go through the curriculum. I am very lucky to have a library right next to my job, so after work, if I have not hit my studying goal for the day at work (it honestly depends on my workload each day), then I will book a study room to study for an hour or two.

I try to keep my lunches free from studying. I don't like to mix eating and work and I enjoy talking to my coworkers during lunch.

Some personal pointers: meal prepping for your week helps free up some time, being physically active in the morning give me more energy (pilates, stretching, weight lifting), my faith keeps me grounded and gives me the strength when I feel like I don't, and I drink herbal teas to help with any imbalances (to help me sleep, digestion, inflammation, etc).

This is what works best for me. It's been a lot of trial and error, but I found something that is helping me stay routine, consistent, and still healthy for me!

Being in the United States is necessary to be in NYC, but not sufficient.

Being in NYC is sufficient to be in the United States, but not necessary.

Things are clicking!!

Hi! Please add me to this. I live in the Chicago area and am looking for more people to help keep me accountable and maybe even study with!

"Which" can be used to refer to nouns or entire referential phrases (which include the subject and predicate).

My list of strongest to weakest

1. Disney - each claim that was made was supported by another claim, hence leading toward a very straight forward conclusion.

2. Tigers - Tigers being aggressive directly supports that they are not suitable to keep as a pet. It does hinge on the assumption that aggressiveness and causing injuries to people is not a suitable pet. It makes logical sense. but an assumption is needed to get there.

3. Many assumptions are needed to get to the conclusion that Mr. Fat Cat is guilty. What if he ate something else? Just because the salmon spilled, doesn't mean it is eaten. It is not mentioned that EVERY time he licks his paw, that means he's eaten. And how do you even know the cat's intentions? NONE of the claims are supported.

This argument had multiple premises of support which created a strong argument, for the conclusion. I would argue that due to the Tiger argument just having one premise of support, it is not as strong despite still being true. Many things could have led to the conclusion that no all mammals are suitable for pets. They were both supported arguments, I think they just varied in strength due to the amount of premises given and the logical conclusions given from said support.

Hi! I'm Kennedy, I am 22 and a recent graduate of North Carolina A&T State University! I currently live in the Chicago Suburbs, working as a legal secretary at a Public Defender's office. I hope to apply in the Fall of 2026! I am looking for more study buddies and accountability partners!