@ElaineRogers i think he ment grappling

@edward.ratkoczy preferably yes or shorter

Hope this helps someone:

Op said : no big tech, no game.

Arg said: You yappin. We got a lil tech to help. We game.

Flaw: lil tech =/= big tech

Part of system =/= entire current tech available

@daisylul me, I find it simpler

I only got this correct because I got it wrong before— and ever wrong answer burns a match in my eyes every time I see it again!

@watersam10151992 not sure if u took the test already but when u have 2 answers left you pick the one that most connect to all of the necessary’s in the context. This is always how I rule them out

@ANP I got the last 2 questions, including this one right as well. Underline the necessary predicates in the stimulus to show you what you need to focus on

• B: People who attempt to diagnose their medical conditions are : Necessary (likely to do themselves more harm than good unless they rely exclusively on scientifically valid information.)

In the stimulus it says in the conclusion the same thing. For me the rest of the options canceled themselves at staying off the topic for each other the necessary conditions within the stimulus. There are several NAs in the stimulus—

• …can’t discriminate between valid I. And quackery

• …it’s usually written more clearly than scientific papers

• …. Are likely to do themselves more harm than good.

if these are all the necessary conditions… what can you estimate from each other answers given?

Clearly not A or E

It can’t be C because is talks about an outside subset ( those who know medic info)

D tripped me up but I focused on the essence of what was necessary for the whole argument. D was referencing the information- which is valid— but not what we are looking for which is the whole point “ more harm than good”

Hence is why I chose B…hopefully seeing my thoughts process helped

God is good. 3 correct in a row

The first sentence was written diabolical. Had to reread it and contra to understand

@CaseyLiu or we could give feedback so that the ones that understand can mention they did well on something so that others can ask if they need help. we in the same boat. But I get it — it’s frustrating

M coupon book. -> All pizza accept

C refused M coupon -> motive hurt M

Must be: M coupon -> C refuses/hurts M

A) “Any” — they are major competitors (clearly setting example for others)

Specifically if we need to connect A -> C we should try to target the first section of prem and the ending goal — this case motive— was to hurt M

Hope that helps

A lot of people are struggling to connect it back to the lessons. Here’s what I wrote.

#2-3 : lessons 2 &3

#5 : lesson 4

#6: lessons 5-6

This wasn’t so bad. The conclusion was focusin on data sets between the two. So that for me immediately eliminated all except B and D. I was going to pick D, but then remembered that ideal experiment— which rendered B correct

I’ll just take the L for this one. They all looked too weak— should’ve did the spectrum

@JRamirez I overcame this issue by basically putting everything in a box and everything outside of that box doesn’t exist . That means that I focus primarily on first keywords that I’m supposed to look for based on the type of question or answer that I’m looking at. If the keywords don’t do me much for me then I will do process of elimination on the obvious ones that it cannot be and then work my way argument back again

@maciascarmen6455 hey three or higher is an automatic wind for me. Anything lower as well like I should’ve gotten it right which is just a Hit to my self-esteemif I miss.

@jolie.abdo32 I actually have two journals. One is for all the lessons that are detailed, including all the examples written and everything.. the journal I’m currently using I use for the main skeleton structures and main points so that I can reference back when I’m d blind review. Hopefully that makes sense.

If you do the causal chain- which is what I did you’ll see that it’s actually working backwards from “Furthermore,…” The second sentence was the outlier which was the same thing from the previous lesson question. I saw how that sentence was too vague and therefore the weakest link in the chain. Looking at the root words specifically the antibiotic— then it was POE for the answer choices.

I mistook the herbivores to still be predators since the pyramid visual of each level is a predator to the one below. I took it as a trap answer

Almost had me between D and E but looking at the subject again between the two it was clear which one was right

The easiest one yet

U lost me with math

@RyanAlexander Carmen would’ve had it and House’s response would’ve been because you like to hold hands and talk about your feelings lol

@MontrealAllen I read it like this…. We are talking about the ability “record annually”. For me mentally I realize that it was either a three ways. One it was either by the concept of technology advancement, advancement in science as a whole for weather, or by word of mouth, which for this day and age of 1953, it would be more likely. Hope that helps.

I feel like this was pretty obvious