User Avatar
MichaelFire
Joined
Jun 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 175
CAS GPA
4.0
1L START YEAR
2028

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT145.S1.P3.Q14
User Avatar
MichaelFire
2 days ago

It seems to me that the main point of passage A is that in history there was a trend away from studying Women's individual lived experiences and toward gender as a social structure, and that we lost care about historical women's lived experiences as a result.

Not too difficult for me as a history major, but for any non-humanities major, I can see how this can seem confusing.

2
PrepTests ·
PT153.S4.P3.Q14
User Avatar
MichaelFire
2 days ago

I got -1 on this passage and that's my greatest achievement because TF???

1
PrepTests ·
PT115.S4.Q23
User Avatar
MichaelFire
Edited 4 days ago

The way I can best describe the correct answer is with math!

It goes: Bring about X economy, then after that, achieve maximum total utility.

There is a % chance of achieving X economy, and a % chance of achieving maximum utility. The most likely option is the higher product of these two probabilities.

So a critic could say that a pure free market economy could only have a 1% chance of being brought about if pursued by the controlled economy, but then a 100% of achieving maximum utility.

On the flip side, a controlled economy has a 100% of achieving a controlled economy (it already has one) and has a 50% chance of achieving maximum utility.

Both these situations satisfy the premises that the editorial gives, but the free market getting total utility is only a 1%, while a controlled economy is 50%.

The key part of this problem is realizing that achieving this outcome is a two-step process, and the editorial doesn't give us the odds for the transition from controlled to free market. Therefore, it does not justify that switching to a free market is the most likely outcome to achieve maximum utility.

1
PrepTests ·
PT156.S4.Q10
User Avatar
MichaelFire
Tuesday, Jun 9

I got this one right but totally missed the distinction between residents of a city in the hospital and residents of a city in that cities hospitals. I just thought that the City Y had such better quality hospitals that people would leave it more often, thus balancing out any people sent for treatment. Bruh.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?