1/5

I keep confusing Sufficient for Necessary!! Like in number 2 :(((((

Omg.. I was stuck on Q4 for at least 30 minutes trying to figure out why 「Commerical airline pilots - m -> enjoy flying」is wrong. And, just maybe, I cracked the code. This worked for me... kinda.

So, let's use a different example to tackle this question.

Premise 1: All students in Mr. ThisQuestionPissedMeOff's (Mr. TQPMO) class are on the school bus.

Premise 2: Most people on the school bus have brown hair.

• Can we validly make the argument that Most people in Mr. TQPMO's class have brown hair?

  • The answer is NO. Why?

• Let's just say that there is only 10 students in Mr. TQPMO's class and there is around 50 students on the school bus.

  • We know that most of the students on the school bus have brown hair, so more than half of the students have brown hair.

  • 26 - Brown / 24 - Not Brown

• Can we conclude that all of Mr. TQPMO's students have Brown Hair?

  • No! There is no way of knowing. For all we know, all 10 of Mr. TQPMO's students could have hair that's NOT brown.

• I know this example is exactly like the one given, but I just couldn't figure it out for the longest time until I used a really easy example like this to finally understand the one given.

@GabrielLerma thank you this actually helped me to understand better cause I had the same question

@AveryRooney28 i'm on the same boat brother but don't feel discouraged! At first, I felt really discouraged as well because i got a 1/5, but don't give up! Take the time to actually understand these questions and do more of em. You will surely improve! Every mistake helps you in the long run!

3/3 omg im so glad i am improving a least a little :)

For number 5 can the premise and conclusion be flipped around if the conclusion indicator "consequently" isn't there?