User Avatar
NathanHochman
Joined
Jun 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
NathanHochman
Friday, Jul 3

I really struggled with question 3, got it right for different reason and wanted your opinion. I thought the conclusion was that the groups of turtles were distinct ie lived and bred separately. I thought that answer D showed that these turtles are potential a genetic match with both groups signifying both groups mating and therefore weakening the idea of them being distinct and seperate in terms of breeding. Does this logic still work or did I get lucky?

1
User Avatar
NathanHochman
Thursday, Jul 2

@bellas32110 my worst

1
User Avatar
NathanHochman
Thursday, Jul 2

@LoganSpina did the same thing and eliminated everything but E as a result

1
User Avatar
NathanHochman
Wednesday, Jul 1

@DouglasSmith I found the conditional statement to be complex reasoning sufficient for changes in behaviour. Ie changes in behaviour are necessary for complex reasoning. And that makes the most sense with our answer which is "if complex reasoning (sufficient) then behaviour changes possible (necessary)".

1
User Avatar
NathanHochman
Wednesday, Jul 1

@Kevin_Lin Yes please

1
User Avatar
NathanHochman
Wednesday, Jul 1

7 answer A is also wrong because simultaneously suggests that Pluto could be considered a true planet AFTER it was ejected because it would no longer be a moon. Simultaneously doesn't say anything about classification once the state of being a moon ends because of ejection.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?