- Joined
- Aug 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@AlexMarko It's a two step deduction. not a fish -> must be a parrot because that's the only other option -> parrots are noisy by the earlier point. It doesn't work for D: not a parrot -> must be a fish -> nothing is stated about fish noise levels.
Another way of looking at it is that a conditional statement is not equivalent to its inverse: we have parrot -> noisy but not ~parrot -> ~noisy.
Hello,
I'm just getting started with 7Sage, but before I found out about y'all I already started practicing using the free LawHub practice tests and drill sets (specifically prep tests 140 and 141, the first 5 LR drill sets, and 3 RC drill sets). And I was just poking around to give 7Sage a shot, but then I saw one of the first lessons used the "Spanish 101" question from prep test 141, so I'm worried that I'm going to be exposed to a lot of the same questions. I haven't subscribed yet, but when I do, will the completed questions be synced over from LawHub? Or is there some other way to mark them internally?
(P.S. I'm optimistic about so far about 7Sage, given my previous strategy was to track all my question types in Excel and use a complex formula to figure out my weakest areas and then seek out similar problems in borrowed LSAT prep books... 7sage definitely seems more streamlined. And it even has games!)
Edit: I just realized my PTs were automatically imported from LawHub and already incorporated into its analytics, so that's great! I'm still not sure about the LawHub drill sets though
I was initially thrown off by the word "different." I was thinking it was only required for at least one company to be unable to meet its short-term needs, but re-reading the question, the sufficient condition in "Such retraining can be efficient only if it allows individual companies to meet their own short-term needs." is about multiple companieS