@bilingualspeechpath107 "OP" means original poster. For example, the OP (original poster) here would be the user HappyTestTaker, since this post was theirs originally, thus beginning this entire conversation thread. When user lagata said that they were turning on notifications to hear the OP's answers, they meant that they wanted to hear the response of HappyTestTaker in particular to the question that user BrynnaM asked. Hopefully this makes sense 😊

@MA66 This is exactly the comment I was looking for. Although I understand why E makes the most sense, I agree JY might have been a bit confused about his explanation of C.

Rather than giving 3 other possible reasons for the abnormalities, given that: "all of the test subjects were of similar age and weight and...health", we could potentially rule these 3 out as causal factors. If anything it would mildly strengthen the argument, or do nothing -- it doesn't seem C would weaken the argument, though.

#feedback

@NoraElkhyati I never realized this was even a thing. Genuinely thank you so much!!

@Isra I was having issues yesterday with a class recording not playing, but I was using firefox with VPN. I switched over to chrome with no VPN and reloaded the page and the video played as normal. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@Hanifa More is not necessarily half +1. Anything more than 50% (more than half) is still considered most. I don't think that the example for #5 should be considered incorrect. In other problems, even if the majority is a large majority, it still is a majority (most)

@ManusWeber -> is my go-to. I only use one hyphen to make things as simple as possible.

Are we going to see any stimulus on PTs or the LSAT that actually looks like question #1, or are these exercises simply to help us strengthen our abilities to identify premises and conclusions? I'm wondering if there will be any non-arguments on the LSAT for LR sections.