how do we know that "in direct reaction to" means that he did the opposite of it? couldn't it also mean that he built off of it? this is a hard question

oh I thought D was a little too obvious because they essentially outright state that

could not figure out what they meant by scholarship

so I was in between A and D but chose A because D has strong wording and the stimulus doesn't use strong wording

but it doesn't mention a consequence?

I was in-between B and D and chose D because I wasn't sure you could definitely say that because the moon left that earth wouldn't be able to support life. couldn't there be other factors influencing that?

@SarahHolmes754 like I got a 2/5 but I already knew one of the answers because we practiced it so I really got a 1/5 and I was so confident like BROOOOO

oh my god am I the only one who did awful on this

blind review is being weird. it told me I got 60% but then when it suggested which questions to review it selected 4/5 questions. well now I'm doubting all my answers and changed one of my correct answers to be incorrect??? why won't it just tell me which ones I got wrong geez

what do you mean by "if one speaker expresses no opinion" dont both always express an opinion?

I guess I got confused because this question wasn't talking about populations that settle. it's talking about populations that migrate. I thought settled populations was out of scope

I've never been more confused and frustrated in my life. none of this makes sense and all the arguments seem valid to me ;(

ugh I translated it into logic correctly but still got the answer wrong

I don't really see how the Westeros example is a conditional statement. and does the subject --> predicate thing work on every example? or just those without indicators

oh dear my brain cannot wrap around this