I actually didn't even bother to read this. would take wayyyy too long for me to read and understand what the stimulus is saying

this was SO hard. I eliminated all of them twice and had to go back and really look at the answers to figure it out

idk that I would consider health absolute though

I dont see how she makes a distinction between 2 situations. she only mentions ONE situation? the recently overturned rulings

I dont think we necessarily NEED to know what a rebate is in order to answer this question. although for those confused, its a refund

I think I approached this as a must be true cause I was like "how do we know establishing this committee would reduce injuries?" but maybe thats not the best approach with this type of question

I actually am shocked that I didn't pick C. I did POE and ended up with B

dang I thought the answer was too obvious

@limecicnodar124 wait WHATT

how do we know that "in direct reaction to" means that he did the opposite of it? couldn't it also mean that he built off of it? this is a hard question

oh I thought D was a little too obvious because they essentially outright state that

could not figure out what they meant by scholarship

so I was in between A and D but chose A because D has strong wording and the stimulus doesn't use strong wording

but it doesn't mention a consequence?

I was in-between B and D and chose D because I wasn't sure you could definitely say that because the moon left that earth wouldn't be able to support life. couldn't there be other factors influencing that?

@SarahHolmes754 like I got a 2/5 but I already knew one of the answers because we practiced it so I really got a 1/5 and I was so confident like BROOOOO

oh my god am I the only one who did awful on this

blind review is being weird. it told me I got 60% but then when it suggested which questions to review it selected 4/5 questions. well now I'm doubting all my answers and changed one of my correct answers to be incorrect??? why won't it just tell me which ones I got wrong geez

what do you mean by "if one speaker expresses no opinion" dont both always express an opinion?

I guess I got confused because this question wasn't talking about populations that settle. it's talking about populations that migrate. I thought settled populations was out of scope

I've never been more confused and frustrated in my life. none of this makes sense and all the arguments seem valid to me ;(

ugh I translated it into logic correctly but still got the answer wrong

I don't really see how the Westeros example is a conditional statement. and does the subject --> predicate thing work on every example? or just those without indicators

oh dear my brain cannot wrap around this