Are there any questions where we can directly attack a conclusion or premise? Or are we always looking to exploit the gaps between the conclusion and premise(s)?

I got this right based on POE but I kept thinking the right answer would include something like "there has been legal precedence where hail damage was covered by the insurance policy"-- does legal precedence just not matter or if there was an answer choice that said something about it, could it have been better than B?

I love these! Definitely more please :) Thank you Kevin and Jy!

Is there a baseline for when we should use/ or eliminate prescriptive answer choices for certain answer types?

Same for descriptive answer choices

Hi Kevin! Thank you for your lessons! A few quick Qs for you:

- Is this more of a drill or should we be making low res summaries on the actual LSAT too?

- And about how long should we aim to spend on the summaries?

-And then how long on actually reading the passage?

Question-- due to current events. For the 7sage predictor, do you think that URM will still be a thing in this year's admissions? Or should we be calculating without?

I love the motivation breaks! We should have more! Haha