Brutal, they got me

B is a terrible answer choice. There is no raccoon for the analogy to work. Totally BS

anyone else dislike the "should" in answer choice D? I was wary of choosing a perspective claim "following most logically" from a set a descriptive claims. It's making a value judgment whereas all of the premises are neutral. Just because the revision in the tax structure would be necessary for improve their economies, why should governments do that? I suppose you have to assume that it's good to improve the economy which would be a somewhat reasonable assumption but I don't like it logically.

This was tough but I didn't like any of the answer choices so I reread the stimulus. Usually, quorum means majority, and so I supposed the two were mutually exclusive (the bag of skittles cannot be both majority red and majority yellow). I just recalled that definition for quorum, otherwise I would have been stumped.

@IsabelTing11 that's a good catch. it never explicitly states what the norms are.

@aishazafar335563 Yeah it's tricky. The social norms prohibit both chefs and comics from violating the IP. What you and I got confused about is the enforcement mechanism which you are correct, is talked about in A but not B. But look again, the answer choice only mentions the norms, not how compliance to such norms are encouraged.

Choice B, on the other hand, is the best answer. The first passage explains why comics don't usually use the law but there is no explanation in passage B as to why chefs do not.

A got me. That was a very clever trap! GG I guess LSAT

@samstich2001118 x contributes to causing z. y also contributes to causing z. But it would not be valid to say that either x or y cause each other. That's the error that D is pointing out.

Bruh what? It literally says "one must return to one's origins" in the second to last line. He is suggesting that nativism is imperative, albeit with limitations. This question is ridiculous tbh.

Got it right but spent way too long

"Images of European authority over other cultures" begins the sentence and so I was looking for a "ritual, ceremonies, or tradition" that would be of the colonizing power. That's why I went for B.

I recognize now that D does fit the criterion of "reinterpretation" though whereas B does not.

@me92 Hahaha yeah that line also hit me. Aren't I paying you to help me get hard questions correct? lol, this whole damn test is full of hard questions

@ga4842993 Yeah it's a trap answers because the argument is explaining why the two concepts are disanalogous

Lol, they should make the question prompt more convoluted next time

That's a tough one. I also didn't like how D had the focus on the basis for the approach (Taphonomy) but I guess it is inaccurate to say the traditional theory has been replaced.

@AngFloz huh? How would the Bible be helpful?

@HayleeHarris I don't see what is wrong with my attitude. No, it's not just "one more word," it is the essential word in the first sentence of the US Government's founding document. Without understanding of the word "posterity," then we cannot know for whom this country exists, or to whom its government belongs. And finally no, Americans are not from drastically varying backgrounds. We are "One Nation under God," see John Jay's Federalist Paper No. 2. Hope this helps!

getting this correct in about 1:20 is crazy!

@juliabesse212944 Huh, Which words?

@Big_Dogg42069 I've had that problem. Just try restarting the browser. It worked for me.

@JPolus I think you've raised an interesting point. Should we have our top law schools and legal system filled with non Americans? Many of whom unfamiliar with our founding legal documents? Food for thought...

Haven't watched it yet but really don't feel like the explanation video for this question had to be nearly 18 minutes.

@nehemieeloiseau304 Lawyers

@JimMcEnulty Academic language. I think we'll have to read a lot of material like this in law school

When I heard the learn'd astronomer...