@me92 Hahaha yeah that line also hit me. Aren't I paying you to help me get hard questions correct? lol, this whole damn test is full of hard questions

@ga4842993 Yeah it's a trap answers because the argument is explaining why the two concepts are disanalogous

Lol, they should make the question prompt more convoluted next time

That's a tough one. I also didn't like how D had the focus on the basis for the approach (Taphonomy) but I guess it is inaccurate to say the traditional theory has been replaced.

@SavannahMiller We don't but in English it is customary to use male pronouns when the gender is unknown.

@AngFloz huh? How would the Bible be helpful?

@HayleeHarris I don't see what is wrong with my attitude. No, it's not just "one more word," it is the essential word in the first sentence of the US Government's founding document. Without understanding of the word "posterity," then we cannot know for whom this country exists, or to whom its government belongs. And finally no, Americans are not from drastically varying backgrounds. We are "One Nation under God," see John Jay's Federalist Paper No. 2. Hope this helps!

getting this correct in about 1:20 is crazy!

@juliabesse212944 Huh, Which words?

@tjh361508 Really? That's crazy!! A woman not being logical? I cannot even fathom it

@Big_Dogg42069 I've had that problem. Just try restarting the browser. It worked for me.

@JPolus I think you've raised an interesting point. Should we have our top law schools and legal system filled with non Americans? Many of whom unfamiliar with our founding legal documents? Food for thought...

Haven't watched it yet but really don't feel like the explanation video for this question had to be nearly 18 minutes.

@KaylaStewart I am not a feminist.

This presumption of female pronouns is getting ridiculous. This tutor is four times more likely to refer to an anonymous author with "she" than "he". What the flip?

@nehemieeloiseau304 Lawyers

@JimMcEnulty Academic language. I think we'll have to read a lot of material like this in law school

When I heard the learn'd astronomer...

@StupidName Yes, and especially because it is conditional, my understanding is that this was this was a hypothetical with this potential technology could save money on electric bills. Very frustrating. I was not even attracted to the other answers and picked up on the flaws in both B and D but C appeared irrelevant.

@StupidName same but I think the "thereby saving money" clause wants us to take into account the other factors. Horrendous question tbh

"They misunderestimated me" -George W Bush 

wow he's really getting us all hyped up for these questions! Love it!

I play basketball. Therefore, I am one of the best players in the world.

Necessary assumption: I am in the world.

I know a lot of history and I do see history as the working out of moral themes. Checkmate Historian

@katrina I think that's the point