Why is D right? Is unintended and unexpected the same thing ?

When saying why answer D is incorrect J.Y says '' Again, Ford and Noguchi didn't have any direct contact ". I don't understand, the passage clearly says, " He met the architect and philosopher R. Buckingham Fuller". what is J.Y talking about, this does not make any sense to me.

For Q. 19 what is J.Y talking about? Why is answer B incorrect J.Y says "After a shoe manager suggests .... no no no no no" and he says, " It's not like Ford suggests it to Noguchi". But the passage literally says "He suggested using copper-nickel steel" he is being a referential to ford. I don't understand.

I don't understand, if the auto safety experts concluded that "the increasing popularity in SUVs is an alarming trend", wouldn't they account for the possibility that that there is a higher percentage of fatalities among SUVS. Their conclusion was that the popularity among SUVs is an alarming trend NOT that the FATILITY rate among SUVs is an alarming trend, and with this logic answer D would be wrong. Additionally the only way for them to conclude that that the POPULARITY [not fatalities] of SUVs is an alarming trend, would be if there is the same likelihood of SUVs getting involved in a collision as other vehicles, and yet SUVs still get involved in more collisions, (thus causing more fatalities) than other vehicles, thus showing there is an increasing trend in the popularity of SUVs and answer E would be correct

Furthermore, according to J. Y's explanation he says there is an assumption in C but there is also an assumption in D, the assumption in D is just because the average number of fatalities in collisions is higher for SUVs than other smaller vehicles, maybe there are still overall less injuries from SUVs because maybe there are less collisions involving SUVs. In other words when there is a collision, statistics show that the average number of fatalities is higher for SUVs but that is only when there is a collision, but maybe there is less collisions in the first place for SUVs.

# CONFUSED

Why is E right, maybe the Trampoline enthusiast agrees that the activity warrants professional supervision and just disagrees over whether there will still be risk involved.

Why does it not simply reduce to, The cat likes to drink, with milk being a modifier.

why is "foliage camouflages" not the subject predicate, with birds serving as the modifier of "camouflages".

For match the flaw questions is just the actual flaw supposed to match, or also the structure.