Are Governments justified in preventing questions that lend a predisposition to the legality of cigarette advertisement on legal career examination materials?

Interestingly, the tuition for my undergraduate education in Nevada was largely paid for by the 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement which largely curtails tobacco advertising. Nevada uses a portion of the funds from tobacco companies from that agreement to fund an in-state scholarship that largely covers in-state university tuition.

I would buy that whale drawing on a t-shirt.

“but that’s because this person lacks perspective”

LMAO

Because dogs.

This is a fantastic sentence.

This question seems like a great example of how reading the question stem first is a good idea. After the question stem, you realize it’s probably prudent to just flat out ignore Darla’s argument since we’re only looking for a necessary assumption of Charles’ argument.

“I think we all know the definition of truth and yes, it’s what you think.”

… phew

It’s incredible how analogizing using imaginary species like unicorns and pandas makes real world examples feel much more accessible.