This comes across as lazy polling instead of a direct ask with a survey, but I’ll bite.

Shuffle remaining nodes that consider actual progress: I‘ll sometimes dive into different lessons that make sense to me but aren’t suggested as next steps. I’d like to adjust the study plan on the fly with both what I’ve skipped and what I’ve reviewed to redistribute the suggested nodes. Maybe even a button to shuffle the remaining nodes (if applicable).

Might be an opportunity for an occasional point of feedback (e.g., A thumbs up/down for new shuffles, or a feedback text entry on redistributions that included more updates than a “basic” shuffle). But of course, respecting the attention and not repeatedly beating them over the head with prompts.

Add a timer toggle: I wouldn’t think that it’s intentional, but this service and supporting platforms don’t appear to be designed with neurodivergent users in mind. The steps provided by the study scheduler are excellent milestones, but adding a time factor without a toggle to remove it can be considered structural/systemic ableism. As a tangent: It’s astounding that there’s still a timer ticking away even when a drill is created with unlimited time.

That said, I appreciate the ability to pop open a chat window and ask a question.

Seems like AC (A) is the answer that addresses yielding a profit and AC (D) is being shoehorned without explanation beyond “it fills the assumption gap.”

What was given as an analysis titled Notable Assumptions:

“There is a gap in the argument between the premises, which focus on general claims about what films will be shown in theaters, and the conclusion, which makes a specific statement about films young audiences like. There is therefore a necessary assumption that fills that gap - something that explains why the fact that young audiences like a film would help that film turn a profit and get shown in theaters.“

Good call on identifying the gap, but what are the assumptions you’re making to fill that gap? Why title the section Notable Assumptions if there are no assumptions made? Why are we disregarding the “including food-and-beverage concession revenue” premise? If it’s not a premise, why is it identified as a premise?

Need a bit better of an analysis than “This is the gap, here is the correct answer because it’s right, and these answers are wrong because they’re incorrect.”

The analytics of this seem off and the analysis seems incomplete and little lazy.

@Anthony.pardella@gmail.com Study > Lesson Library > Foundations > Disjunction (or)

Totally get the frustration of feeling stuck...test prep is brutal. That said, posts like this make it harder for people who genuinely need accommodations to be taken seriously. The process is already an uphill battle without the perception that people can game the system.

If you're hitting a wall, it might be worth stepping away for a bit and leaning into something you enjoy. Letting yourself subconscious process in the background can lead to some breakthroughs, and coming back fresh does more for your score than grinding through burnout.

That said, if you genuinely believe that you need assistance, there are more effective channels to accomplish that. It might be in your best interest to delete this post.

Wishing everyone here good luck in a way that doesn't come at someone else's expense 💙