I got only three wrong out of 27 questions, but omg this was one of the hardest RC question sections I've ever experienced

25/27 but the RC for this exam was actually so hard

Interested!

Would love to join! My insta is @jawadi94540.evan and my PT high & average is 174 and 172

ughhh I really didn't want to diagram but it's literally the easiest way to solve :/

I swear every question I've gotten wrong have been from weird assumptions that everyone i the comments doesn't like lol

I got this right but this question is insane, should def be level 5 difficulty

I had the same logic JY is giving for C but it requires so many assumptions regarding this particular instance. Really odd question in my opinion

It's context dependent. So, no prior knowledge about the subject is needed as long as you're able to piece information together. (The LSAT like any standardized test is still pretty elitist though lol)

I got a 6/6 wooooo

Lowkey pretty bad explanations for this problem set

bro really responded to this 7 months later to say this

.

This question hurts me physically

This is such a badly written question, the conclusion is less clear because it doesn't offer a straight-forward hypothesis of why the stickleback has armour, but instead its potential benefits in terms of defending against predators. I swear, if the conclusion was just better formulated, this would make a lot more sense. smh

I'm interested!

The slash negation symbolism is making my formal logic phil background go insane

Interested!

I just got my philosophy degree and I swear that most academic philosophers write like this. :/