I'm interested!

I got a 6/6 wooooo

Lowkey pretty bad explanations for this problem set

The slash negation symbolism is making my formal logic phil background go insane

Interested!

I just got my philosophy degree and I swear that most academic philosophers write like this. :/

25/27 but the RC for this exam was actually so hard

ughhh I really didn't want to diagram but it's literally the easiest way to solve :/

.

This question hurts me physically

I got only three wrong out of 27 questions, but omg this was one of the hardest RC question sections I've ever experienced

Interested!

This is such a badly written question, the conclusion is less clear because it doesn't offer a straight-forward hypothesis of why the stickleback has armour, but instead its potential benefits in terms of defending against predators. I swear, if the conclusion was just better formulated, this would make a lot more sense. smh

Would love to join! My insta is @.evan and my PT high & average is 174 and 172

I swear every question I've gotten wrong have been from weird assumptions that everyone i the comments doesn't like lol

I got this right but this question is insane, should def be level 5 difficulty

I had the same logic JY is giving for C but it requires so many assumptions regarding this particular instance. Really odd question in my opinion