It's so sneaky that Umit doesn't even mention the words urban or cities in his argument

@dxyonna you've got this!!

@PowerUp_Tutoring bro you comment on everything, are you an AI bot? stop

i just hate these question types so much :(((( how do you get better at them

The clinic administrator (CA) doesn't mention the rodriguez family or the conditions AT ALLLLLL, so how do we know if the CA thinks they're adhering? It only mentions the technology and how that can lessen suffering.

@Great1720 can you explain this more? don't quite understand if what you have in caps is your reasoning its wrong, or if it's how you're describing that answer choice??? what?

literally hate the phrasing of E

it feels like the sentence about birds, fish, and squirrels is providing support for the last sentence, which is why I thought the last sentence was the conclusion.

Biggest takeaway for me on this is that I need to be better at thinking ahead of what the answer should be so that I don't fall into other "good" sounding answers, but answers that don't actually get at the flaw of the argument. If I had thought more about how the main flaw is the correlation causation, I would not have been as tempted by answer choice B, because it doesn't really get at that correlation causation flaw.

:( vibes are bad on this one

I swear, every time I start a video JY says "this was a tough question". However I guess that means I'm only missing tough questions?? silver lining???

@JulienHajenius I don't watch it if I easily understand why I got a question wrong after just looking at what the correct answer was + the short lightbulb explanation. Most of the time, that doesn't feel like enough and I end up wanting to know the reasoning that got to the right answer so I watch the video and/or go through these discussions.

I'm not 100% sure if this is corret way to daigram, so someone tell me if I'm wrong, but I found it MUCH easier to think about this one with a venn diagram. Then it's easier to see that A can't be true, because there may be some monstrous beasts movies that don't describe violations of laws of nature. Please tell me if you agree or disagree!

JD spends too much time on answers that are not popular and too little time on answers that ARE popular. He spends almost two minutes on A which says is 0% popular, so that's kind of a waste of time! and B is 26% popular and he spends less than half the time explaining that answer! Please break down what people are most struggling with.

@blueground thanks, no offense to JY but his explanation was lacking here to break this down

@yeenatime yeah same, i literally was thinking "Wtf" reading all of these options

@jdo whoops tagged the wrong person above

@JohnDemmler I had the same problem with this and it took me a while to come around here, but I think it boils down to the question asking for "MOST helps" so it doesn't have to be perfect or "must be true". I guess you could say that answer D, if it were true, would most strongly support their argument, even though it isn't a perfect principle to match up. Let me know if others disagree!

I just want to say that I'm genuinely glad you don't feel the need to do a wrap up at the end of all these videos, they just end when the content is through. No time wasted or fluff!

giggled when you said shitty artwork. i must be sleepy.