- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
The argument in the stimulus relies on the assumption that Mr. T doesn't have his guest's diamonds. Answer choice A relies on the assumption that food from the camp cafeteria doesn't cause illness. Perfect match.
RC-LG-RC-LR
English is my second language and this is my first time to take a proctored official LSAT. The first RC made me panic. I held my breathe to the point that I started to feel dizzy. LG is my strongest part in PTs, but I stressed out at Game 3 (partically because of my terrible experience in my first RC) and didn't get time to finish the rest of the games. During my 10 mins' break, I wanted to give up on this test. But I continued.
The beginning of the second half of the test was a lot smoothier than the first half. I reminded myself to keep breathing as I concentrate on the test. My family thought my exam would finish at 1pm but it actually went to 1:30pm. They made some phone calls around 1:15pm when I was doing the last 10 LR questions. I was distracted and stressed again at the end of the test.
Some takeaways from this "super practice test":
Keep on breathing deeply while wading through
Skip to the next game if having trouble setting up the current game
Make sure I have a quiet environment to the end of the test next time
keep on practicing!
I think I can do a lot better next time!
I understand other answer choices are wrong. But I still feel pretty uncomfortable with E. The stimulus says some kinds of copyright statutes are justified by providing incentives to produce original works. It means some other copyright statutes are not justified by providing incentives to produce original works. Am I right? And E says if a statute is to be justified by its benefit to society, then... But we don't really know whether those copyright statutes grant copyright protection until many decades after the authors' decease is justified by providing incentives to new original works. What if they are justified by other reasons? Then E becomes entirely irrelevant. #Help
B is incorrect for two reasons:
1. We can't say that the pollution from rainwater runoff is a more serious problem. While it is true that the pollution from rainwater runoff exceeds that from industrial discharge, we don't know what should be considered a more serious problem. What is serious? We don't know.
2. We are asked to identify the role serving in the argument. These roles include premise, conclusion, and sub-conclusion. B and E simply didn't indicate any of the roles serving for an argument.
Unicorn lol Thanks for the humour