I translated this as:

computer modelling -> increase rush hour traffic -> resolve financial predicament

But, I still got the right answer. Did I do something incorrectly? This doesn't look like the contrapositive of what he did in the video but I cannot see why it is wrong.

King when are you guys dropping weighing sections and drills into analytics

Wrongly chose C cause I figured Passage A supports environmentalism since B says that people who argue like Passage A are actually fake environmentalists, but passage A doesn't really take a stance on whether they have genuine enviornmental intentions which makes it wrong.

B is a better answer because although it doesnt include aquatic furbearer populations it still does say furbearer populations aren't affected

Takeaway: Supersets, don't choose answer choices that an author doesnt take a stance on on these attitude comparison Q's

Wrongly chose A even tho I know its not really supported that injunctions are actually justified in these scenarios cause B seemed too strong - but B is okay because "apparently" means that based on the passage it does not appear that there is a better solution - not that it is true that there is NO solution

Takeaway: If you know an answer isn't supported - don't choose it - choose the more complex answer that you think may have SOME support