press agent could've told every reporter the same amount of information even if it was not everything

@Max Thompson Why doesn't the stop sign example count as an instance of the application of the theory that someone's testimony could be affected by things outside of the court room?

King when are you guys dropping weighing sections and drills into analytics

Wrongly chose C cause I figured Passage A supports environmentalism since B says that people who argue like Passage A are actually fake environmentalists, but passage A doesn't really take a stance on whether they have genuine enviornmental intentions which makes it wrong.

B is a better answer because although it doesnt include aquatic furbearer populations it still does say furbearer populations aren't affected

Takeaway: Supersets, don't choose answer choices that an author doesnt take a stance on on these attitude comparison Q's

Wrongly chose A even tho I know its not really supported that injunctions are actually justified in these scenarios cause B seemed too strong - but B is okay because "apparently" means that based on the passage it does not appear that there is a better solution - not that it is true that there is NO solution

Takeaway: If you know an answer isn't supported - don't choose it - choose the more complex answer that you think may have SOME support

I translated this as:

computer modelling -> increase rush hour traffic -> resolve financial predicament

But, I still got the right answer. Did I do something incorrectly? This doesn't look like the contrapositive of what he did in the video but I cannot see why it is wrong.