I felt myself might be the worst RC test taker in the discussion section. I have no idea how to improve it. Focusing on big picture has no help for me. I simply do not understand what the passage was talking about! My LR is now -5 but RC score could not be worse.
It's the biggest obstacle on my LSAT journey.
I think this question is tricky bc of the last sentence starts with yet!!!!!!!! Yet is always an indicator for a conclusion but obviously it's not here.
1. There's a common belief: thoughts are directly perceived. But there's a psychology experiment involves children proves the assupmtion wrong.
2. The analogy between experts make inferences in some particular areas and the way we make fast and direct perception is the same, which explains why we believed we're always accurate at inferring our own thoughts.
3. Psychologist emphasized the importance of external behavior impacts our thoughts but the author thinks it should be internality.
1. Marsalis was the King of the Jazz. However, he received tremendous critics.
(How? For what?)
2. Recording companies emphasized on old recordings.
(Any connections with critics?)
3. Publics thought that Marsalis was partly culpable for the trends of traditionalism, which inhibited the development of Jazz.
4. Author's oppinion: the author stands by Marsalis and believed he wasn't a mere revivalist. The fault was made by record companies.
5. The real reason record companies reissued old songs: profit.
This question is a bit problematic. I got the right answer by POE but I really don't like this question.
For B), you have to assume that buying the global positioning systems for few cows would be cheaper than buying fences. Okay. what if it costs $1000 to get one positioning system and it only costs $3 per fence at home depot?
--------------------------------------------
For C), significant stress?????
Scientists removed a gene from a fly species, so now these flies have no uv vision.
Flies that were not gene-changed have uv vision.
Conclusion: in general, if a fly in this speies has no UV vision, the cause is the damage of the gene that scientists removed.
We have to assume this removed gene is the sole determination.
Hi, I am so proud of you. I always happen to see your comments under many LR questions. I remember you and I'm not surprised you killed the test!
Because local soil conditions varied widely and the concentration of either form is unpredictable in the real world.
Therefore, data drawn from the lab is midleading.
(the gap is lab is not creating the same environment or factors same in the real world).
Read Carefully!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wanna know if I'm the only person who always have worse performance on the 2nd LR comparing with the 1LR section, especially after PT80 due to my foggy mind while reading so many long stimulus and long ACs. I mean these long arguments are really annoying.
I read the stimulus 2 times and didn't get the flaw until BR.
Note: it may take up to 10 days to be delivered. But if Mary is lucky, her application might be delivered within 8 days.
Jesus, I thought the main conclusion is the last sentence. So I quickly and happily chose E and moved on.
D) is wrong bc the manager never talked about shorten/extend the total vacation time.
A) Strengthen. Astronauts wouldn't be able to exercise
B) Our stimulus never mentioned any theraphy. This is the correct answer
Hmmm, violation of principle (MBF)
The 1st sentence is about bg so it's not important.
Gov:
No justified scientific evidence AND conducting the test may misled public
Therefore, test is not allowed.
Quickly elimated C) D) E)
B) Provide info to company. out of scope
A) is the right answer.
1: Introduction posited by scientists: Big bang theory
2. Based on Chen and Carroll, big bang theory accouted for the beginning of universe but not the multiuniverse ( bigger concept)
3. Explannation of time. Some changes happens, and it will cause disorder
4. With all information we discussed, it's not helpful to answer why our universe started with hot and dense. okay, Chen and Carroll suggested that what if our universe started with cold and empty.
5. Another two scients supported Chen and Carroll.
6. The initial of our universe may not be the only case.
So basically the premise is talking about percentage and the conclusion shifts to amount.
My instant feeling was to choose B), however, I re-read it and negate it in a wrong way: there are terraces( some) on farmland in Dooney County which were not built to prevent soil erosion.
respect= kind
Fully content--->NOT dislike--->kind--->prosper
I feel like for answer choice A) human habitation is not the same thing as human colony. Human colony is a bigger concept; whereas human habitation could be a place of one single family.
I felt like the most terrible order for me would be RC, RC, LG, LR
It would be extremely awful to have two RCs in a row and they are the first 2 sections.... I am so nervous.
I would be mentally exhausted to do the rest two sections.
Worst among the worst: the 2nd RC is the real RC section that accounts.
Okay, here's a logic I would like to share: if Sam has more money than Jim, this fact does't guarantee that Sam is a rich person. Both of them might be broke but sam may have 5 more bucks than Jim.
Got this Q correct but I think it could be very hard since the stimulus is wordy!
When I was doing it timed, I imagined a historical figure to make everything more understandable: Alexander the Great
I now know why C) is wrong.
C) mentions nothing about increased reliance on computer.
Practical intelligence=skill
Development on your own→Practical intelligence
Therefore:
Depriviation + immediately given→Practical intelligence
It's been a long while that the word "last" has no meaning to me anymore, every time I see the word "last", I actually see lsat.
OMG.
Nah, practicing law at about 30 is not late at all (for your question 3). Your experience as USMS officer will bring you a lot more than what class can teach you after you have JD degree.