One way I looked at D was like this. It says they have skipped work sometimes. Ok, maybe he isn’t lying. Maybe they have done that. Maybe not within the last 2 years, maybe during the last 5 years. Maybe some one else have been consistent for the last five years and is more qualified. Think of this analogy. Our lsac GPA. Maybe our last 2 years after transferring has been all As, but they still calculate the first 2 years as well right?

Do the lessons. All of them.

Do all the quizzes. If you have time check the explanations for them. At least few of them. If you got something wrong or wasn't sure about definitely go over the video explanations though. The quizzes can only help imo.

After you finish each lesson and chapter, i highly recommend doing the first and last problem set for each section/chapter. First one is from the easiest questions. Last one is from the harder questions. Go over the explanations for these two sets. I do not personally recommend doing all of the problem sets. Keep them pristine and ready to be done after you start doing prep tests and figure out your weaknesses ( by using the analytic).

Now as for the single questions that exists in each chapter. I do recommend doing those and going over video explanations. From my personal/anecdotal observations those questions are not just selected randomly. They ( purposefully or not, though i assume purposefully) showcase different ways those questions can appear.

This is in my opinion an efficient way to go through the CC. Depending how much you study every day, I think you should be done with it in 2 to 5 weeks.

Take your time and learn them. Don't rush it imo.

Hope this helps.

Interested as well :). Currently 170, pushing for higher spectrum of 170s.

really hard

18 For C i kinda mistook it as disease too. Like, still the bacteria would require humans to spread from person to person. But your explanation made sense. Bactria can still spread to the further places through other means ( like sea water, crabs, ...).

Take a day off. Or if you feel you need to keep studying more, take few hours off and do something you enjoy. Try to relax a bit. If you have been doing 1 to 3 mistakes and now it is 5 to 7, it could very well be the nerves or burn out or something like that. I have gotten to the point that i do every single question right on lg but on occasions i miss 1 to 3. Usually what was the case for me was that maybe i was a bit tried.

Also try to eat healthier foods, stay dehydrated and get enough rest. These are all very important to perform well on such a high stress test. Maybe meditate a bit or listen to a relaxing music.

Best of luck mate.

Couldn't have said it better than Dinosaur. Naturally occurring seems to be implied to be the bad kind. This is just an assumption that i am brining in, but going by the word i would assume naturally occurring means just that. Happening in nature. We don't know the mechanism that can happen, but if it is something that can happen naturally, what if we don't know about it and not knowing about it lead to an outbreak? When you get vaccinated chances are you are more monitored and less chance of outbreak.

Now let's assume you didn't hone into all these details. What if you didn't notice all of these? Well you are in luck. Because you are just trying to weaken the argument. You are not trying to destroy it. If an answer choice destroys the argument obviously it weakens but at the same time probably a lot less subtle and easier to find out. There will be harder questions that the answer choices are not as subtle. You have to realize that answer choice A by just adding numbers it is weakening. We don't know if "some" is greater than 7 or not and the good thing about a lot of weakening questions ( including this one) is that we won't have to know if it is greater than 7 or not. Since I repeat myself, you are just trying to weaken the argument not destroy it.

All this said, we have to be careful about number and percentage weaken questions. A lot of times in those type of questions the relationship between numbers and percentages matter a lot. But that's a topic for another time.

Hope this helps.

The way I choose between C and D was by trying parallel. C is saying frogs are the only animals ( no other animal). But like stimulus isn’t proving enough information to us to know if there are other types of stones are present in there. So it doesn’t parallel.

Also for B don’t we have to make an unwarranted assumption that the cars with air bags don’t have those other safety features as well ?

#help (Added by Admin)

hi. first thank you for such a great site. i had a question. there is no sound for this question explanation. is it on my side or this question's sound not working anymor? other questions work.