Discussions

User Avatar
austingoss398432
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT155.S1.Q23
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Saturday, Nov 02 2024

For some reason I really didn't struggle with this question, like I would have normally done so. I think for me once you get through the dense language (diagramming) the answer itself was very obvious. C strengthens the claim by tying the meteor to Mars. My takeaway is diagram out the stuff that seems intimidating.

0
Lessons · You Try - VideoKing Frequent Viewers Club
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Wednesday, Oct 30 2024

F you Pat

13
PrepTests ·
PT154.S2.Q24
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Saturday, Oct 26 2024

Not trying to be a dork, but I think if I got this question on a real LSAT I would consider contesting it

9
PrepTests ·
PT158.S4.Q18
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Wednesday, Oct 02 2024

I understand its your style JY and it doesn't bother me a ton but you can be overly dismissive - I think - of incorrect answer choices. This is a good example, according to my page D was the second most popular AC. In hindsight we can see why it's wrong but you're laying it on sort of thick in your assessment of it. I have seen others complain of this and didn't think too much of it, but after watching +20 explanation videos in one day I can get the gripe a little more.

10
PrepTests ·
PT116.S3.Q24
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Saturday, Sep 28 2024

This is a good example of one type of a must be true question where the answer choices language matters. I got this one right, and its because right away - I knew A and D were 99% sure wrong because they say "all," without even looking at what they said. Then you can eliminate E because the logic doesn't make any sense, and from there you have B and C and it becomes clear which is the better of the two choices, even if you're unsure there.

I hope this is useful to someone, comments on questions I struggle with often help me a lot.

3
Study Groups · November 2024 Study Group
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Wednesday, Sep 04 2024

Also would be interested - it seems based on your feedback a GroupMe would be most appropriate.

0
User Avatar
•

Tuesday, Sep 03 2024

austingoss398432

Doing drills without cutting into PTs

Hello,

I am studying for the November LSAT, and am wanting to get some feedback.

Currently, I am working my way through Logical Reasoning, and as such am doing roughly 5-10 questions or prep per day. I have taken one diagnostic test (basically completely cold to start) and have not done any since.

My question is: is there a way to use certain questions for drills, without seeing them again when you do practice tests? Is this a concern that anyone else has worked through, or just me? I don't mind a little cross over, but I just don't want a ton as I feel like that would give me an inaccurate picture of what my scores are on PTs when I get to that point.

Thank you for your consideration and time!

0
Lessons · Some Before Some
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Wednesday, Aug 21 2024

So far, I am only using lawgic when the sentence is really winding or confusing, such as the kind you actually see on the LSAT. And there, I am more just using it as a way to get to the bottom of what something says and not trying to memorize.

0
Lessons · Most Before Most
User Avatar
austingoss398432
Wednesday, Aug 21 2024

this rocks, thanks man

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?