@blueground 3 weeks later, i did it again!

who's determining the level of difficulty for these questions? clearly they don't know any better. This should be level 3 minimum

how is this level 2?? the difficulty level is so inaccurate

there was no evidence to begin with

Since JY doesn't explain properly here's a basic explanation:

There is only 1 set comprised of 2:

1st = SWIDERSKI & TERRADA

2nd = TAGAR

"The argument provides no justification for giving preference to the views of one (SWIDERSKI & TERRADA) rather than the other (TAGAR) of two competing sets of authorities."

C makes no sense - the authoritative figure could be referring to Jury OR Prosecutor

i read immoral as "immortal"

am i the only one who struggled with what quintile means

can we have Kevin's explanation on all questions - its more clear