and is not necessary (tee hee) refering back to conditional logic

see previous comment

it devalues 7sage

Really? "fuck yo ?"

Has the english language fallen this far, that profanity is found in valid educational instruction?

These practice problem answers disappoint.

The instruction asks you to apply what you have learned. The answer explainations are poor in that they do not provide a step by step (as in the instruction) and in one question, the answer even introduces a new rule. Do better.

When one is first learning, as in these lessons, to not define every step is a disservice to the learner paying for this service. I would like to see EVERY conclusion depicted explicitly to see if I am on the right track. DO the contrapostive and WRIGHT organized columns for the SOME relationships. ""Negate, some", Negate, some" is annoying, WE already know that YOU know this well. DO Better. Please. Your job is to make sure that this is CLEAR to your student.

Is this portion of the lesson wrong?

The “only” indicates necessary condition. He says it indicates a sufficient condition

and proceeds to put that condition on the right side of the equation.

I just did a drill and cannot get the answers. THIS happens often and it SUCKS.

Arrowing back does not work. It just generates a new drill with different questions.

What I like about this lesson is use of the word "I" in its decription. The writer, a human like me, is teaching me one of his/her personal tricks to make vague concepts tangible. There, I don't feel so all alone on this LSAT endeavor.

PS: I draw pictures.

PS: PS: Can you make unlimited copy paper available to all test takers? Presently it is 6 sheets, 12 sides and this is no where near enough for a visual learner. : ]

PS:PS:PS: Can you do this by this Friday when I take this test? : D

(Sycamore, IL on April 11, 2025 )