Hi, all,
Let's give everyone some reassurance! I know there are times I need/want it which means there are possibly others out there who need and want it.
My initial, blind diagnostic was a 143. Since then I've gone up to a 146. Progress is progress.
Context: I just started my study journey. On day 9. It's going well, in my opinion, and I'm working very hard to not get discouraged for a few reasons. 1) As we've heard the LSAT is HARD. 2) I've only studied 9 days. 3) I've been out of school for nearly 6 years. May sound like excuses but the facts are the facts.
Any similar stories, or success stories of raising your score overtime? Let's help everyone out and put their nerves and emotions at ease! We know, after all, that we CAN do this. Despite it maybe not feeling that way a time or two. (Or more.)
I'm not seeing how the answer choice weakens the argument. The argument is: our best sales reps have A but not B. So we should hire people who have A but not B. I feel like that makes a TON of sense. Why would the answer that tells them to hire people with A but not B weaken it???? I understand the prejudice and failing to consider and blah blah blah - but his argument makes a lot of sense. How does the answer which just reiterates the argument weaken it?? If your best programmers all interned at Google so you want to hire programmers who interned at Google why would you doing that weaken your argument??