+1

Terrible explanation

A lot of unnecessary complaining in the comments here

You could think of B as a strengthening answer

I definitely read this as an MSS and picked D

best comment here

You're not always, what he is saying is that if you read the argument and you understood its structure then you should be able to discern the fluff

To be honest I think this is just a bad question imo

When did the stimulus talk about stability? That threw me off

Can confirm the acid part

This is the best answer to this question imo, thank you!

Would it be fair to approach this question as an RRE? I solved it that way much easier than NA

Tbh the question stem is what made me get this wrong...

Dare I say it was inexplicable?

Forgot to negate E.....

Could someone explain why D is wrong? I realize E is a stronger answer but can't D be correct as well?

#help

Bruh I did not pick D because I thought that was way too simple and easy.....

Same here

So B is right because it required the least assumptions?

I eliminated E on the fact we are told to assume that the premises are true ... Would that have been a good enough reason to eliminate E? I did not see the suff / necess confusion until after

good explanation

That was a really great explanation in relation to heart attacks and false wolf positives

Is there a good explanation for E? funny enough it took up most of my time but it did not feel right to me

Would D be right if this was an NA?

Literally forgot to read the "only" smh