User Avatar
changrichard94444
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Dec 31 2019
User Avatar
changrichard94444
Thursday, Nov 28 2019

Thank you!

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Wednesday, Aug 26 2020

@ I don’t think all Hispanics are URM. I’m pretty sure Spanish people from Spain are not URM. And I don’t think there’s a lot of evidence that people like Brazilians or Argentinians see the same amount of URM boost traditionally given to Mexicans, African Americans, etc.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Aug 25 2020

I do not think you are a URM in the traditional sense. URM is Mexican, Puerto Rican, and African American.

I do not believe Brazilians, Argentinians, Chileans, Guyanians,Cubans, Uruguayians, Peruvians, etc. other South Americans are considered URM. I also don’t think being part of an indigenous community back home matters for URM - just as I don’t think ethnic indigenous Uighurs in Xinjiang, China are considered URM for law school.

URM mostly focuses on the disparity between that population in the US and that population’s enrollment in law school. When compared to African Americans and Mexicans, there are not that many Guatemalan in the US to begin with to point to a big disparity— similar to how there aren’t that many Uighurs in the US to begin with.

So most Early Decision deadlines are November 15. And the latest LSAT score you can use for ED is the October 28 test. Now I think many ppl apply to ED because they’re slightly below both medians or some kind of splitter and want an extra boost. I don’t think the result release date for the October 28 LSAT has been made public, but assuming its about 3 weeks after the test date, we’d expect a release date of about November 18, which is after the ED deadline.

So what if someone applied ED by the November 15 deadline, and got their October LSAT score of a 175 back on November 18, and then realized that with that amazing score, there’s absolutely no need to ED anywhere, and that he should just instead apply broadly via regular decisions.

Is there a way to contact the school he originally ED’d to say I no longer want to ED there? Or to change that ED to a RD?

@"David.Busis" Do you have any insight on this? Thank you!

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Friday, Sep 25 2020

@

this is straight from 7sage consultant @

https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/145371

"I would caution against writing anything about a history of underperforming on standardized tests. The bar exam is a standardized test and admissions committees are looking to bar passage success when reviewing applications as well. Good luck!"

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Thursday, Sep 24 2020

How are you gonna pass the bar exam? It’s a standardized exam

Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.”

This is bc (According to powerscore Lr bible) the effect is always produced by the same cause.

But in PT 88.4.24, AC A seems to show no cause but effect, which seems to fit into powerscore’s definition of weakening causality. Is AC A wrong because of “sometimes”, which makes that AC too weak?

For me, AC A seems to mean in cases without traumatic experience, medical condition causes cortisol change.

Given that the original conclusion is traumatic event causes cortisol change, would AC A fall into the no cause, but effect category? Would it be right if the word “sometimes” was removed from AC A

Thanks

Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"

User Avatar

Tuesday, Oct 22 2019

changrichard94444

PT88.S4.Q26 - SA Q on microbes/methane

I got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premise(which didn’t seem that relevant at the time). Both sentences are conditional.

My question is in these questions, how can I tell what is the main conclusion? I was not super familiar with the topic(microbes/methane) and I had trouble identifying the main conclusion, so I just poorly assumed the last sentence was the main conclusion. But how could have I had known that the 2nd sentence was the main conclusion and not the last, given that both sentences were conditional statements and it was not super obvious or intuitive (and it was hard using the “because” test of “because P, then C” since it was difficult to determine what was P and C due to the obscure stimulus topic on microbes/methane?

Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Sep 22 2020

No. Once you withdraw before test, it just disappears. It’s as if nothing happened.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Monday, Sep 21 2020

No

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Apr 21 2020

I’m interested!

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Monday, Sep 21 2020

A score lasts 5 years. No difference in terms of when you take it in those 5 years. What you get matters the most, not when you took it in that 5 year period.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Sunday, Sep 20 2020

once you take the LSAT and have an official LSAT on record, that's all that matters. Law schools will only look at your LSAT. Your GRE is now irrelevant.

User Avatar

Friday, Sep 20 2019

changrichard94444

Comments on explanation videos are cut off

For many of the longer user comments on JY’s video, they seem to be cut off. Usually, you can click something that ll expand that person’s comment, but for some reason that button isn’t there (I don’t see it), so I can’t read longer comments of people posting their own explanations. Anyone else have similar issue?

User Avatar

Friday, Jul 19 2019

changrichard94444

October 2019 - VERY limited locations?

Is it just me, but is the October 2019 test have VERY FEW locations? I went from having a testing cite 4 miles away from me for June/September, to that site not being open anymore and the closest cite being 20 miles away.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Sunday, Nov 17 2019

Thank you!

User Avatar

Monday, Sep 16 2019

changrichard94444

How did you reduce screen glare for digital test?

My test center has these large overhead lights throughout the large room (seats 70 ppl). There are like many rows of these big bright lights. It was helpful with the paper test as the area was very lighted.

But with the digital, No matter what angle I tilt the tablet, it just reflects a different set of lights. So when I look at the screen, I see 2-3 big bright lights reflecting in the screen. The glare is Kinda annoying/distracting and doesn’t feel great on my eyes. Any advice on how to fix or reduce this glare? Thanks.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Thursday, Nov 14 2019

Hi @ thanks for following up. I meant those recorded webinars like Can’t Get Right’s Post Core Curriculum Strategies, testimonies of various sages on their 170+ scores, a strengthen/weaken question webinar, a webinar on skipping questions,etc.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Apr 14 2020

I am also having technical difficulties, at the video explanation page

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Friday, Aug 14 2020
User Avatar
changrichard94444
Friday, Aug 14 2020
User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Nov 12 2019

i also can't access courses on iPad. very inconvenient! also, i cannot access any of the video explanations @ @ please help as i basically cannot do any LSAT work on my iPad, which is important as the test is now digital on a tablet. thank you! ** i typed this while on my computer as i cannot access it via my iPAd.

I’ve heard there is a “LSAT” watermark thing on the middle of the scrap paper. How big is it? (I’ve heard it was like 2 inches large?) Was it distracting? What did it look like? Could you write over it with a pencil? Did it affect your LG set up and questions?

Also, with the scrap paper, if you do your logic game on the right side page of the booklet, you could always write on the left side page too if you ran out of room on the right side page?

Hey all

So my October LSAT is in the grand Hyatt NYC hotel, which is in midtown. I’m coming from NJ so I’m taking the NJ transit to Penn station. I’m thinking I might need my phone in this journey to use google maps as I make my way to the test center. Is there a place I can put my phone at like the hotel before I enter the test cite? Or should I make the commute from NJ to NYC without my phone, and just memorize the directions in my head?

Also, if Anyone had experience testing in grand Hyatt nyc or at hotel, would love any feedback or advice. Thank you!

@"David.Busis"

I think it was briefly mentioned in the UVA webinar (please correct me if I’m wrong too) that if you’ve been out of school for 1-3 years, it’s strongly recommended (in a sense, it seemed that it was implied that it was almost mandatory) that you get at least one letter from an employer.

This, however, seems to contradict some information from law schools websites/blogs. For example, Yale Law School’s Asha’s blog says “there are a few basic rules you can follow to increase your chances significantly. One of those rules is to submit two references from faculty members who have taught you in a class. Let me put that another way: Your chances of admission to Yale Law School go down drastically if you submit only one or no academic letters of recommendation...NOTE: If you DID submit two academic letters, you do NOT need to submit additional ones at this point. I'm sure some economist could graph this out for me, but there is an optimal number of LORs for Yale and it's somewhere around 2.4...Generally speaking, LORs from faculty will carry greater weight than LORs from employers. This is because the people reviewing your application tend to be more interested in what you were like as a student and what your potential to succeed academically at Yale would be, rather than in whether you are a good "team player" or can "work quickly and efficiently."

https://law.yale.edu/admissions/jd-admissions/ask-asha/bad-idea-jeans-biggest-mistake-you-can-make-your-yale-law-school-application

It’s also important to note that the average age at YLS is 25, with about 85% of admitted students at least 1 year out of college.

I agree letters from employers can be helpful, but it seems that for those out of college for 2-3 years, submitting 2 academic letters from professors is fine, and there’s no “penalty” if you don’t submit an employee letter. After all, you could be spending those 2-3 years working in a retail job or even as lawnmower as you study for the LSAT, from which it’ll be difficult for your employer to speak about your potential success in law school in terms your ability to think critically, understand complex arguments, write persuasively, etc.

Thus, for applicants a few years out of college, having 2 letters from professors seems fine, and not having an employer letter doesn’t seem like it’ll hurt you. After all, for that person who spent the last 3 years working as a restaurant waiter or that individual who started their own small chocolate business may not have an employee LOR, but I don’t think that’ll hurt them as long as they have at least 2 letters from their previous professors.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

PrepTests ·
PT104.S1.Q26
User Avatar
changrichard94444
Tuesday, Jul 06 2021

#help How do I know when to use lawgic for parallel reasoning questions? This question doesn't require any lawgic, yet I approached this question with lawgic when I first read it....

User Avatar

Saturday, Jul 06 2019

changrichard94444

PT87.S2.Q18 - Some killerwhales eat fish exclusively

Can someone explain why C is right and E wrong? Is it bc C aligns with the hypothesis and is what we would expect assuming the hypothesis is true, whereas for E, E allows a scenario where seals start off ignoring whales that do not eat seals, which would go against the hypothesis?

Also, I felt the language about the seals “ignoring” the not threatening whales confusing. It took me while to figure out that “ignoring” just meant not being scared of them and even being willing to go close to them. It’s the opposite of “aversion”. Anyone else got tripped up on this?

Admin note: edited title

Admin note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-87-section-2-question-18/

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Friday, Sep 04 2020

anyone else have LR East/west monkeys? found that tough man.

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Wednesday, Jun 03 2020

I’m assuming this is most relevant for people who want to apply for admissions Fall 2022, given that Winners are announced January 2021?

User Avatar
changrichard94444
Thursday, Apr 02 2020

@ yea I agree with a lot of what you said

LSAC said that they would allow test takers to adjust the tablet stand at any angle except straight up(which I think is 90 degrees). Previously you could only tilt it 30 degrees. They made this change to better help avoid glare.

Was your experience In October where you could adjust the tablet stand at any angle? Was that more helpful in avoiding glare? Thanks

Confirm action

Are you sure?