In terms of formal logic, Does “probably” mean “most”?
Or in other words, does “probably” mean 51% or more?
In terms of formal logic, Does “probably” mean “most”?
Or in other words, does “probably” mean 51% or more?
For those who took June test, I’m sure you have many questions on why 1 AC was wrong and why the other 4 were wrong. Or what would be the fastest way to solve a logic game. Please msg me or comment below if u want to have a group call where we can discuss the exam and answer any questions we have about it.
@ I don’t think all Hispanics are URM. I’m pretty sure Spanish people from Spain are not URM. And I don’t think there’s a lot of evidence that people like Brazilians or Argentinians see the same amount of URM boost traditionally given to Mexicans, African Americans, etc.
I do not think you are a URM in the traditional sense. URM is Mexican, Puerto Rican, and African American.
I do not believe Brazilians, Argentinians, Chileans, Guyanians,Cubans, Uruguayians, Peruvians, etc. other South Americans are considered URM. I also don’t think being part of an indigenous community back home matters for URM - just as I don’t think ethnic indigenous Uighurs in Xinjiang, China are considered URM for law school.
URM mostly focuses on the disparity between that population in the US and that population’s enrollment in law school. When compared to African Americans and Mexicans, there are not that many Guatemalan in the US to begin with to point to a big disparity— similar to how there aren’t that many Uighurs in the US to begin with.
So most Early Decision deadlines are November 15. And the latest LSAT score you can use for ED is the October 28 test. Now I think many ppl apply to ED because they’re slightly below both medians or some kind of splitter and want an extra boost. I don’t think the result release date for the October 28 LSAT has been made public, but assuming its about 3 weeks after the test date, we’d expect a release date of about November 18, which is after the ED deadline.
So what if someone applied ED by the November 15 deadline, and got their October LSAT score of a 175 back on November 18, and then realized that with that amazing score, there’s absolutely no need to ED anywhere, and that he should just instead apply broadly via regular decisions.
Is there a way to contact the school he originally ED’d to say I no longer want to ED there? Or to change that ED to a RD?
@"David.Busis" Do you have any insight on this? Thank you!
@
this is straight from 7sage consultant @
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/145371
"I would caution against writing anything about a history of underperforming on standardized tests. The bar exam is a standardized test and admissions committees are looking to bar passage success when reviewing applications as well. Good luck!"
How are you gonna pass the bar exam? It’s a standardized exam
Can anyone explain this question for me? Have no idea why the right answer is right and how it weakens argument. Thanks
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
I got my October LSAT reassigned to the Grand Hyatt New York. Has anyone taken it there before? How was it?
Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.”
This is bc (According to powerscore Lr bible) the effect is always produced by the same cause.
But in PT 88.4.24, AC A seems to show no cause but effect, which seems to fit into powerscore’s definition of weakening causality. Is AC A wrong because of “sometimes”, which makes that AC too weak?
For me, AC A seems to mean in cases without traumatic experience, medical condition causes cortisol change.
Given that the original conclusion is traumatic event causes cortisol change, would AC A fall into the no cause, but effect category? Would it be right if the word “sometimes” was removed from AC A
Thanks
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
I got this question wrong because I misidentified the conclusion. I thought the last sentence was the conclusion and the second sentence was a premise(which didn’t seem that relevant at the time). Both sentences are conditional.
My question is in these questions, how can I tell what is the main conclusion? I was not super familiar with the topic(microbes/methane) and I had trouble identifying the main conclusion, so I just poorly assumed the last sentence was the main conclusion. But how could have I had known that the 2nd sentence was the main conclusion and not the last, given that both sentences were conditional statements and it was not super obvious or intuitive (and it was hard using the “because” test of “because P, then C” since it was difficult to determine what was P and C due to the obscure stimulus topic on microbes/methane?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
No. Once you withdraw before test, it just disappears. It’s as if nothing happened.
A score lasts 5 years. No difference in terms of when you take it in those 5 years. What you get matters the most, not when you took it in that 5 year period.
once you take the LSAT and have an official LSAT on record, that's all that matters. Law schools will only look at your LSAT. Your GRE is now irrelevant.
For many of the longer user comments on JY’s video, they seem to be cut off. Usually, you can click something that ll expand that person’s comment, but for some reason that button isn’t there (I don’t see it), so I can’t read longer comments of people posting their own explanations. Anyone else have similar issue?
For the PT 87 RC comparative passage 4, the video explanation for the passage B is not uploaded. When you click the video explanation, it just brings you back to the explanation for passage A. So there are 2 duplicate videos for passage A, and no video explanations for passage B.
Is it just me, but is the October 2019 test have VERY FEW locations? I went from having a testing cite 4 miles away from me for June/September, to that site not being open anymore and the closest cite being 20 miles away.
Is there way to edit answers after you graded test on analytics? I Didnt fully finish Br and accidentally graded the test. I want to update my BR changed AC’s.
I know uva has a 15 day turnaround for ED. Can you ED multiple law schools, like Cornell and UVA at once?
Thank you!
My test center has these large overhead lights throughout the large room (seats 70 ppl). There are like many rows of these big bright lights. It was helpful with the paper test as the area was very lighted.
But with the digital, No matter what angle I tilt the tablet, it just reflects a different set of lights. So when I look at the screen, I see 2-3 big bright lights reflecting in the screen. The glare is Kinda annoying/distracting and doesn’t feel great on my eyes. Any advice on how to fix or reduce this glare? Thanks.
Hi @ thanks for following up. I meant those recorded webinars like Can’t Get Right’s Post Core Curriculum Strategies, testimonies of various sages on their 170+ scores, a strengthen/weaken question webinar, a webinar on skipping questions,etc.
I remember there was a tab for webinar videos. I can’t find that anymore. Does anyone know how we can access the webinar videos? Thanks.
I am also having technical difficulties, at the video explanation page
Anyone else on "wait list" for October LSAT in NYC/NJ metro region? Hopefully they'll add some test centers. The fact that we're about 3 months till the October test, and there's not a single open test center in the NJ/NYC metropolitan region (the most populated area in the United States) is quite ridiculous.
i also can't access courses on iPad. very inconvenient! also, i cannot access any of the video explanations @ @ please help as i basically cannot do any LSAT work on my iPad, which is important as the test is now digital on a tablet. thank you! ** i typed this while on my computer as i cannot access it via my iPAd.
I’ve heard there is a “LSAT” watermark thing on the middle of the scrap paper. How big is it? (I’ve heard it was like 2 inches large?) Was it distracting? What did it look like? Could you write over it with a pencil? Did it affect your LG set up and questions?
Also, with the scrap paper, if you do your logic game on the right side page of the booklet, you could always write on the left side page too if you ran out of room on the right side page?
Hey all
So my October LSAT is in the grand Hyatt NYC hotel, which is in midtown. I’m coming from NJ so I’m taking the NJ transit to Penn station. I’m thinking I might need my phone in this journey to use google maps as I make my way to the test center. Is there a place I can put my phone at like the hotel before I enter the test cite? Or should I make the commute from NJ to NYC without my phone, and just memorize the directions in my head?
Also, if Anyone had experience testing in grand Hyatt nyc or at hotel, would love any feedback or advice. Thank you!
As a grandfathered Ultimate+, where is the 1 month extension button? I cannot seem to find it on the "settings" tab. Help please. Thanks.
@"David.Busis"
I think it was briefly mentioned in the UVA webinar (please correct me if I’m wrong too) that if you’ve been out of school for 1-3 years, it’s strongly recommended (in a sense, it seemed that it was implied that it was almost mandatory) that you get at least one letter from an employer.
This, however, seems to contradict some information from law schools websites/blogs. For example, Yale Law School’s Asha’s blog says “there are a few basic rules you can follow to increase your chances significantly. One of those rules is to submit two references from faculty members who have taught you in a class. Let me put that another way: Your chances of admission to Yale Law School go down drastically if you submit only one or no academic letters of recommendation...NOTE: If you DID submit two academic letters, you do NOT need to submit additional ones at this point. I'm sure some economist could graph this out for me, but there is an optimal number of LORs for Yale and it's somewhere around 2.4...Generally speaking, LORs from faculty will carry greater weight than LORs from employers. This is because the people reviewing your application tend to be more interested in what you were like as a student and what your potential to succeed academically at Yale would be, rather than in whether you are a good "team player" or can "work quickly and efficiently."
It’s also important to note that the average age at YLS is 25, with about 85% of admitted students at least 1 year out of college.
I agree letters from employers can be helpful, but it seems that for those out of college for 2-3 years, submitting 2 academic letters from professors is fine, and there’s no “penalty” if you don’t submit an employee letter. After all, you could be spending those 2-3 years working in a retail job or even as lawnmower as you study for the LSAT, from which it’ll be difficult for your employer to speak about your potential success in law school in terms your ability to think critically, understand complex arguments, write persuasively, etc.
Thus, for applicants a few years out of college, having 2 letters from professors seems fine, and not having an employer letter doesn’t seem like it’ll hurt you. After all, for that person who spent the last 3 years working as a restaurant waiter or that individual who started their own small chocolate business may not have an employee LOR, but I don’t think that’ll hurt them as long as they have at least 2 letters from their previous professors.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Anyone taking LSAT at Brookdale Community College, NJ?
#help How do I know when to use lawgic for parallel reasoning questions? This question doesn't require any lawgic, yet I approached this question with lawgic when I first read it....
Can someone explain why C is right and E wrong? Is it bc C aligns with the hypothesis and is what we would expect assuming the hypothesis is true, whereas for E, E allows a scenario where seals start off ignoring whales that do not eat seals, which would go against the hypothesis?
Also, I felt the language about the seals “ignoring” the not threatening whales confusing. It took me while to figure out that “ignoring” just meant not being scared of them and even being willing to go close to them. It’s the opposite of “aversion”. Anyone else got tripped up on this?
Admin note: edited title
Admin note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-87-section-2-question-18/
Can someone explain why is B right and C wrong for this argument part question? Tough question.
Admin note: edited title
Anyone take LSAT at Doubletree Hilton Newark Penn Station or Seton Hall? How was your experience? Thank you
anyone else have LR East/west monkeys? found that tough man.
Powerscore said June 2020 flex was from Feb 2011/2012. Should we practice with older LSATS from the 2011-2013? Or will we have a brand new test for the upcoming July flex? I feel like there are slight differences btw 2012 tests and 2019 more modern ones. Thoughts?
I’m assuming this is most relevant for people who want to apply for admissions Fall 2022, given that Winners are announced January 2021?
@ yea I agree with a lot of what you said
LSAC said that they would allow test takers to adjust the tablet stand at any angle except straight up(which I think is 90 degrees). Previously you could only tilt it 30 degrees. They made this change to better help avoid glare.
Was your experience In October where you could adjust the tablet stand at any angle? Was that more helpful in avoiding glare? Thanks