User Avatar
christinajooce205
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT105.S2.Q24
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Tuesday, Jul 30 2024

When the stimulus said "but not consumed", I thought that meant that the amount of coal of coal they were talking about was the amount of coal they dug up never used any of it, like how squirrels would hoard nuts. I was so confident that the correct AC would be A because it never mentioned the idea of consuming the coal. I feel so stupid now.

User Avatar
christinajooce205
Thursday, Jul 25 2024

Could an assumption be both necessary and sufficient or are they two totally separate things? I'm trying to think of a possibility where they could overlap, but haven't really thought of one so far.

PrepTests ·
PT114.S4.Q10
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Thursday, Jul 20 2023

I'm not sure if I'm over thinking this question, but I thought that D was incorrect because it would generalize the statement to all workers. Isn't this implying that all workers would be less satisfied despite not being directly affected? For example, would workers really be less satisfied with their job if they are doing a super unique job that could not be replicated by a computer?

I answered C because it directly mentioned workers who would be directly impacted by the technological progress. I think I understand why it is considered wrong because the stimulus didn't provide enough proof to support that a worker would necessarily oppose technological progress. However, I'm still not fully confident in understanding why D should be correct if it is so generalized.

#help

I'm currently in the middle of the course curriculum and have gotten a few (too many) questions wrongs on some of the drills and practice questions in the middle of the lessons. I've reattempted some LG drills consecutively because I wanted to drill in the inferences that I've failed to make before. Although I've noticed improvement in my time and accuracy with each new clean attempt, I'm worried that this is only because I have been working on the same game with only an hour break in between, and I'm getting the question right only because I've seen the question and correct answer before. In other words, I'm worried that my studying method is not the most optimal use of my time and resources because I think I've memorized the specific games and rules by rote memorization rather than learning how to make inferences faster for new games on tests.

While I mostly focused on the instance for LG, I was wondering if I should have a longer cool down period of revisiting the same drills for other practice sections and drills too. I'll try to revisit them again after a week or so, but I'm also worried that I just don't have a lot of time for the upcoming test in October ;-;

PrepTests ·
PT102.S3.Q21
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Wednesday, Jul 17 2024

Usually I don't watch all of the explanation videos, especially when I think I understand them, but boy oh boy am I glad I stuck around for "boners for Homer"

User Avatar
christinajooce205
Friday, Jun 16 2023

I'd also love to join this group chat!

User Avatar
christinajooce205
Thursday, Jun 15 2023

I am interested in joining the study group as well! :)

PrepTests ·
PT103.S2.Q23
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Saturday, Jul 13 2024

Just realized how similar choice D is actually to choice B. After rereading it, I see why D is not the right choice now :(

PrepTests ·
PT112.S1.Q6
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Thursday, Aug 03 2023

Omg I missed that the stimulus said "it is likely that common wisdom has mistaken". ;-; I went for A and was so confident about it, but now I see that A is too strong of an answer choice.

PrepTests ·
PT125.S4.Q11
User Avatar
christinajooce205
Thursday, Aug 03 2023

#help

Did anyone else choose A and not fully satisfied with the reason JY gave to explain why it is not the main conclusion?

I can see why C is not wrong. It has the idea about there being less carnivorous mammals while the number of reptiles are the same in Australia compared to other continents. It also tacks on the idea that the sparseness is the cause of this phenomena. I really don't understand how that is not sub conclusion/major premise.

From my understanding, I thought that the idea of the sparse ecosystem supports the idea that there are less carnivorous mammals, thus being a sub conclusion/major premise. Can someone please explain how this is more than just a sub conclusion, but actually the main conclusion?

Confirm action

Are you sure?