wow. i completely and incorrectly interpreted AC C OTL

DID IT???????

Just to go more in depth on Q4 AC (A), if predicting is changed to giving hints,

can we infer Q4 AC (A) is supported by the passage in that without knowing rockfall happening in the future due to an earthquake for obvious reasons, it is less likely to be able to predict future events? I know that the passage doesn't talk about lichenometry predicting future events but it could be supported by the passage by making that inference.

I knew (E) was wrong because of the last line.

(B) I eliminated because it is really unstated and unlike A) the passage gives nothing to infer that it cannot be done. But JY explains it and I understand. To make (B) not mostly supported, you need to make a lot of assumptions.

I'm not disagreeing with (B), but I just hope someone to tell me where in my thought process went wrong with (A).

#help

I felt JY screaming at me

you guys just know what nestlings are?

good explanation

so in this case, the correct answer D is suggesting an alternate, better criteria to evaluate the value of the gift thus weakening/destroying their premise that gift receiver will buy at lower price to support the conclusion. ?

wow i got this wrong because i flipped west and east in everyway so b just didn't make sense lol ....sad

So AC (B)'s 'only a short time' doesn't mean like they were not fully ripe....So I thought I had to make that assumption. But I think here, time is in short/long are in century unit.

im surprised how well i did on this passage lol i had no idea what the passage was saying

y is jy drawing circles

edit: wow i didn't even recognize labador dog pet

i got the wrong abc man

d v. e, i chose e :(

i had an inkling that size matters. go with your guttt

i got this right but at what cost

For AC B, I don't understand how JY interprets real people from history as one over the other.

#help

there's no way

i dont know why but i thought marcuse was an ancient philosopher....

I'm not even able to make drills at the moment.

-4 on this section, -3 on this passage. i'll take it.

me not noticing any contradiction

Q26 is not fair...I knew D was correct except the part where it says improved over evolutionary time, which I don't think I can infer. I mean yes, of course it did, but aren't we suppose to not make these assumptions? or it's allowed because it is universally true.

how did JY infer eye closure is subset of cognitive technique? #help

3 stars?

Q17 QS gives me stroke