- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
The happiness you feel when you get the question right with 30 seconds to spare only to find out it’s a lvl 5 difficult and JY says it’s a tough question. I’m on a high right now guys
4/5 on hard. A November lsat really hate to see me coming
Take your time during your initial try. Don’t watch the time
While this means that you are able to parse grammar successfully well, there will be extremely difficult questions on the LSAT that can almost not the answered unless they are written out in lawgic. I would say review the lessons on chaining conditionals so you are mastered in a variety of ways to find the right answer
B+C->A in lawgic reads that two events are jointly sufficient for A. If the question does not add the conjunction “and” then consider both statements as two separate premises. The nect statement(s) or conclusion provided in the question will be the main factor(s) in deciding the validity of the argument.
Your conclusion is valid. This is because the two most arrows MUST emanate from the same set to draw a valid conclusion. Your conclusion here written in lawgic should be GCEB
How do you switch to V1? What is V1?
You got it!
“No Jackson’s are non swimmers”. simply just means “Jackson’s are swimmers”. You just have to use your intuition to know when to apply lawgic
Easiest way I tell folks is to use your who what where and why! Easiest way to ace these questions
This wouldn’t be the kernel of the sentence because it doesn’t encompass all that the sentence is saying. Remember that the kernel of a sentence is not the same as the summary of the sentence. If the kernel is “plants can extract phosphorus” then you’re ignoring a huge part of the sentence which is that it’s botanists who discovered it. Try to see it as “what is the author saying” and not “what is the summary of this sentence”. Hope this helps !
I should have paid more attention in fourth grade, dang
This was awesome, thank you!
Write instead of right as a future lawyer is crazy twin 😭😭