User Avatar
daisyoroma
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Tuesday, Sep 24 2024

Write instead of right as a future lawyer is crazy twin 😭😭

11
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Sunday, Sep 22 2024

The happiness you feel when you get the question right with 30 seconds to spare only to find out it’s a lvl 5 difficult and JY says it’s a tough question. I’m on a high right now guys

19
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Friday, Sep 20 2024

4/5 on hard. A November lsat really hate to see me coming

27
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Sunday, Sep 08 2024

😭😭😭 I-

2
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Saturday, Sep 07 2024

Take your time during your initial try. Don’t watch the time

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Monday, Sep 02 2024

While this means that you are able to parse grammar successfully well, there will be extremely difficult questions on the LSAT that can almost not the answered unless they are written out in lawgic. I would say review the lessons on chaining conditionals so you are mastered in a variety of ways to find the right answer

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Saturday, Aug 24 2024

B+C->A in lawgic reads that two events are jointly sufficient for A. If the question does not add the conjunction “and” then consider both statements as two separate premises. The nect statement(s) or conclusion provided in the question will be the main factor(s) in deciding the validity of the argument.

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Saturday, Aug 24 2024

Your conclusion is valid. This is because the two most arrows MUST emanate from the same set to draw a valid conclusion. Your conclusion here written in lawgic should be GCEB

4
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Saturday, Aug 24 2024

It is valid

1
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Friday, Aug 23 2024

Yes, all negates to some

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Friday, Aug 23 2024

Very true!

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Tuesday, Aug 20 2024

How do you switch to V1? What is V1?

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Tuesday, Aug 20 2024

You got it!

1
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Monday, Aug 19 2024

“No Jackson’s are non swimmers”. simply just means “Jackson’s are swimmers”. You just have to use your intuition to know when to apply lawgic

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Friday, Aug 16 2024

It is!

1
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Sunday, Jul 14 2024

Easiest way I tell folks is to use your who what where and why! Easiest way to ace these questions

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Sunday, Jul 14 2024

This wouldn’t be the kernel of the sentence because it doesn’t encompass all that the sentence is saying. Remember that the kernel of a sentence is not the same as the summary of the sentence. If the kernel is “plants can extract phosphorus” then you’re ignoring a huge part of the sentence which is that it’s botanists who discovered it. Try to see it as “what is the author saying” and not “what is the summary of this sentence”. Hope this helps !

4
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Monday, Jul 01 2024

I should have paid more attention in fourth grade, dang

22
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Friday, May 17 2024

Yesssirrrr

0
User Avatar
daisyoroma
Monday, May 13 2024

This was awesome, thank you!

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?