I actually despise when the answer choice is E. I'll be reading through each answer panicking like "I don't think this is it, but I'm getting to the end and what if the last answer is wrong!?!?"
Can someone confirm that this is why answer choice A) is wrong? I understand that E) is a much better match for the stimulus, but I'm not very confident in my reasoning for eliminating A).
the stimulus says: A or B. not B. therefore A
answer choice A) says: A or B. A. therefore not B.
I see that the structures are different between the two, but at the same time, the general idea is kind of the same
However, A) is flawed because confirming A is not enough to exclude B. The stimulus (and this answer choice) did not say "either A or B, but not both", so in theory, they aren't mutually exclusive. If we eliminate one of the options, say A, then we know it's for sure B because one of the two must occur. BUT confirming one of the options is not enough to say that the other does not occur.
I got this question wrong because I didn't intrepret the stimulus correctly. I understood that it was an A or B scenario (expensive or familiar, but for whatever reason, I didn't pick up on the fact that the prizes being equally unfamiliar is equivalent to saying 'Not B'. Because I didn't realize this, the conclusion 'choose A' really didn't make sense to me - it seemed like an arbitrary decision. Needless to say, I couldn't find an answer choice that matched my flawed understanding of the stimulus :(
#help I don't understand how answer choice B confused a sufficient condition for a necessary condition. Wouldn't the "or" in B be one that does NOT include the option of both, since one cannot go on both rollercoasters for their first ride?
So based on that, I would have thought that /rocket --> mouse works but so does mouse --> /rocket.
I chose E because the stimulus was Ed choosing something and E was the only choice that did this (B too then it became wack so i eliminated this). is this thought process right because i didnt draw any diagrams for this?
I honest to god prefer conditional logic questions... If you just view the question as a math problem where you have to match the given expression, it becomes so easy.
Like, if the question says 1 + 1 = 2, then you are literally just looking for the answer choice that also says 1 + 1 = 2. The only real hurdle is grammar parsing!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
99 comments
UGHHHHHH
It takes so long to do these questions wtf
Maybe I should try to disregard this, but I've had three answers that were E in a row, which really messed me up lol
Now I know why Winnie the Pooh Bear never had a fox character....
"god, miyoko. go talk to a therapist"
these take forever to do jeez
I have been able to diagram these questions correctly thus far, however, my average time has been 5.5 minutes (sigh)...
If this persists, is it really worth sacrificing 3-4 questions we could be working on in the actual test, if we encounter parallel questions?
I've been organizing the content of the stimulus and then shallow-dipping this way using colour and it's been helpful:
im not sure why the the trigger for the stimulus is not choosing B means he will choose A, rather than he chose A not B like it pretty much stated...
i got this answer correct by sheer luck... i panicked #imcooked
I thought of it as
P: A or B
P: ~A
Conclusion: B
It is essentially saying either you're red or blue, you're not blue, therefore you're red.
I found this easier to comprehend, and it is also logically equivalent to what the lesson wrote (~A --> B)
But in my case, I guess it also accounts for
~B --> A
This could be an easier way to understand this/map it out.
There should be a short Lawgic review section before this unit
These questions have me internally screaming.
This question would have been so much easier if Miyoko would just show a little academic curiosity.
I actually despise when the answer choice is E. I'll be reading through each answer panicking like "I don't think this is it, but I'm getting to the end and what if the last answer is wrong!?!?"
Makes me freak out
Can someone confirm that this is why answer choice A) is wrong? I understand that E) is a much better match for the stimulus, but I'm not very confident in my reasoning for eliminating A).
the stimulus says: A or B. not B. therefore A
answer choice A) says: A or B. A. therefore not B.
I see that the structures are different between the two, but at the same time, the general idea is kind of the same
However, A) is flawed because confirming A is not enough to exclude B. The stimulus (and this answer choice) did not say "either A or B, but not both", so in theory, they aren't mutually exclusive. If we eliminate one of the options, say A, then we know it's for sure B because one of the two must occur. BUT confirming one of the options is not enough to say that the other does not occur.
Thanks in advance!
I got this question wrong because I didn't intrepret the stimulus correctly. I understood that it was an A or B scenario (expensive or familiar, but for whatever reason, I didn't pick up on the fact that the prizes being equally unfamiliar is equivalent to saying 'Not B'. Because I didn't realize this, the conclusion 'choose A' really didn't make sense to me - it seemed like an arbitrary decision. Needless to say, I couldn't find an answer choice that matched my flawed understanding of the stimulus :(
Using the shallow dip technique has really helped me get most of these questions right.
#help I don't understand how answer choice B confused a sufficient condition for a necessary condition. Wouldn't the "or" in B be one that does NOT include the option of both, since one cannot go on both rollercoasters for their first ride?
So based on that, I would have thought that /rocket --> mouse works but so does mouse --> /rocket.
the last three "you try" drills having the answer being E is making me doubt myself
I chose E because the stimulus was Ed choosing something and E was the only choice that did this (B too then it became wack so i eliminated this). is this thought process right because i didnt draw any diagrams for this?
I am still confused I am so confused with a because I don’t understand how it’s wrong.
I honest to god prefer conditional logic questions... If you just view the question as a math problem where you have to match the given expression, it becomes so easy.
Like, if the question says 1 + 1 = 2, then you are literally just looking for the answer choice that also says 1 + 1 = 2. The only real hurdle is grammar parsing!
JY eliminating D after the word "Miyoko" was wild
I'm cooked