I am scoring in the 165-167 range on my PTs and want to be hitting about 171 for the November LSAT. I am consistently missing only two questions on RC and getting them all right in blind review. On my last PT, the only reason I didn't get just one wrong on RC is because my time ran out and I couldn't answer it. My LR is obviously less consistent, (-3 and -8 on my last PT, 165). My question is whether I should focus all of my attention on LR in the next few weeks or try to get those easier-to-reach extra two points on RC first. Might be a dumb question just due to nerves kicking in, but curious what the best way to organize my study would be.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Do you recommend flagging the question to return to if there is extra time at the end? Or should we just get returning to it completely out of our head?
19 tripped me up because I did not realize that the main point of the passage is to figure out who controls distribution of the document, not to resolve the tension introduced in the first paragraph. So, it is important to look at what the author actually explains and concludes rather than what the author has simply mentioned. For this, it is important to distinguish what is context and what is the actual argument.
#help Based on the fact that the correct answer on weaken questions only has to weaken the argument, not annihilate it, is it reasonable to assume that only one of the five answers will weaken the argument at all? Or might I ever have to decide which does it the most on a spectrum?
This was a very thorough and good lesson, thank you #feedback