Subscription pricing
This is my score progress since I started 7sage. My struggle has been almost entirely with the logic games. I have a Ph.D. in the humanities with a strong philosophy background and I adapted to reading comprehension and logical reasoning fairly easily. I had to study but I can get -1 or -2 on LR and consistently get -0 on RC. Logic games, on the other hand, has been my bête noire. I started out taking half an hour to get an easy game right. Sometimes I spent 40 min on a medium game. I spent hundreds of hours struggling to improve on this section and tried book after book to no avail. This prep course got me to a -6 to -9 range. I started getting maybe 5 points max on this section. The games were hard for me because they are like nothing I have had to do in my academic journey. They are made up for this test and they are a skill that dies with this test, as far as I'm concerned. I want to give everyone this message that if you suck at one section, you can still get an amazing score bringing yourself to mediocrity or a little over mediocrity on that section even if it takes you hundreds of hours to go from being terrible to mediocre on that section. Strengthen your good sections and power through the bad ones. You can still potentially get a 170 or higher even if you are bombing one section.
Bordwell's definition itself is not obliged to define the musical as classical. The author's point is that Bordwell offers a definition (classical film) that cannot accommodate the musical. The author points out that Bordwell attempts to fit the musical into that category but it doesn't work according to his own definition of the genre. In other words, he is at odds with his own definition, warping it to fit something it shouldn't fit. Bordwell feels obliged to fit it, but his definition is not obliged to fit it. Terribly worded answer choice.