"Many" implies "some" because "many" (a large amount) is higher than "some" (at least one). Therefore, J.Y taught us to think of "many" and "some" as equivalent to help us avoid the traps of confusing "many" with "most" on the LSAT. This is also showcased in answer choice A in the example above.

I hope this makes sense; I am unsure if this helped answer your question! :)

Hey, I can try answering!

"Twenty-one years old or older" is the sufficient condition because of the "anyone" at the beginning of the sentence. "Anyone" is part of the Group 1 conditional indicators (i.e., if, when, where, all, the only, every, any).

Therefore, the claim after the "anyone" is part of the sufficient condition, and the other claim (in this case, it would be legally allowed to buy alcohol) is the necessary condition. Thus, making it 21+ → allow, or in other words, if you are 21+, then you are legally allowed to purchase alcohol.

I hope that helps!

I agree; in Version 1, I recall "never" being one of the indicators for Group 3!

Hello! I would also like to join please!

I don't understand how I get the "Very Low" priority questions right, but I always get the harder questions wrong. Can someone please tell me how I can improve on this?