Subscription pricing
#help
Whenever we are given [P→C] argument. I tend to see [C→P] as a correct strenthening answer choice. I understand that such answer choices try to a create connection between P and C, but isn’t this a negation flaw?
PT Questions
donamhyun690
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jan 07 2021
#help
Is it valid to conclude
X →causes→ BP from
X →causes→ A →causes→ BP?
donamhyun690
Thursday, Oct 08 2020
I'm unsure how you can justify "much" in 13 E. #help
donamhyun690
Wednesday, Oct 07 2020
It is because of "tends". If arranged as attempted, then an arrangement TENDS to be pleasing.
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jul 12 2020
No, it does not weaken because the stimulus never said that genes are not capable of having an impact on a teenager's participation.
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 25 2020
@thisisdavean619 said:
The answer, [B], isn't a [C→P] but rather a comparative statement, saying you learn more about a spot when you spent a lot of time there compared to when you only spent a little amount of time.
Technically the stimulus can be put as [P→C] but so can all valid arguments. I wouldn't even consider this a question where translating to lawgic is helpful. Its more of a argument by analogy with the important part being that both tourism(T) and reading(R) a new book share the goal of wanting to "enlarge understanding rather than simply to acquire information".
It argues because its better to stop and smell the roses while travelling, it is also better for book readers to "stop and smell the roses" by not prioritizing quantity of books read but rather fewer book and spend more time with each.
Answer choice [B] strengthens this by adding additional support for the shared goal (enlarge understanding) between T and R.
Thank you very much!!!
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 25 2020
@thisisdavean619 said:
without assuming you did the translations correct, it's hard to see what you're asking for.
Got any specific examples?
For example, PT67 Section2 #3
Thank you for your help! :)
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 23 2020
we need a time indicator in the necessary part!!!
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 16 2020
For (E), the statement applies to both low-fare airlines and major airlines. So it can't harm our argument.
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 16 2020
[survive]←s→[change core]→[diff corp] becomes [survive]←s→[diff corp]
because...
(1) if [change core], you will always find [diff corp].
(2) if [change core], you will sometimes find [survive].
If you combine (1) and (2), you will find some [diff corp] with [survive], which is [survive]←s→[diff corp].
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jun 14 2020
Four simple steps! (1) Spot the new word in the conclusion: "meaning". (2) Go find "meaning" among the given answer choices: only C and E are left. (3) Eliminate by looking at the details: C is eliminated because "readers agreeing/disagreeing" is irrelevant to the argument. We care about "poem expressing contradictory ideas", not "readers expressing contradicting ideas to the author of the poem". (4) Pick your answer: E! For your conclusion to make sense, you need the readers to have a correct idea.
donamhyun690
Friday, Jun 05 2020
Because OI and I each can happen independently of GA’s presence!
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 04 2020
Are there any ways to quickly solve this type of question??
#help
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 04 2020
This stimulus presumes that things discussed in the stimulus are biconditional & that’s the idea that we need to find in the correct answer choice!
-