User Avatar
donamhyun690
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT152.S2.Q18
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jan 07 2021

#help

Is it valid to conclude

X →causes→ BP from

X →causes→ A →causes→ BP?

1
PrepTests ·
PT155.S3.P2.Q13
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Oct 08 2020

I'm unsure how you can justify "much" in 13 E. #help

1
PrepTests ·
PT153.S4.P3.Q14
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Saturday, Jul 04 2020

Woah! Difficult questions...!

12
PrepTests ·
PT150.S4.P4.Q27
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Saturday, Jul 04 2020

Passage B was difficult :-(

0
PrepTests ·
PT122.S4.Q16
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Saturday, Jun 27 2020

The most =/= Most (‑m→)

0
PrepTests ·
PT123.S3.Q18
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Friday, Jun 26 2020

moral duty =/= morally right

0
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 25 2020

@ said:

The answer, [B], isn't a [C→P] but rather a comparative statement, saying you learn more about a spot when you spent a lot of time there compared to when you only spent a little amount of time.

Technically the stimulus can be put as [P→C] but so can all valid arguments. I wouldn't even consider this a question where translating to lawgic is helpful. Its more of a argument by analogy with the important part being that both tourism(T) and reading(R) a new book share the goal of wanting to "enlarge understanding rather than simply to acquire information".

It argues because its better to stop and smell the roses while travelling, it is also better for book readers to "stop and smell the roses" by not prioritizing quantity of books read but rather fewer book and spend more time with each.

Answer choice [B] strengthens this by adding additional support for the shared goal (enlarge understanding) between T and R.

Thank you very much!!!

0
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 25 2020

@ said:

without assuming you did the translations correct, it's hard to see what you're asking for.

Got any specific examples?

For example, PT67 Section2 #3

Thank you for your help! :)

0
User Avatar

Wednesday, Jun 24 2020

donamhyun690

Strengthen Q

#help

Whenever we are given [P→C] argument. I tend to see [C→P] as a correct strenthening answer choice. I understand that such answer choices try to a create connection between P and C, but isn’t this a negation flaw?

0
PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q3
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Wednesday, Jun 24 2020

-

0
PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q23
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 23 2020

we need a time indicator in the necessary part!!!

0
PrepTests ·
PT130.S1.Q24
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 16 2020

We are looking for the BEST answer!

1
PrepTests ·
PT130.S1.Q18
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Tuesday, Jun 16 2020

For (E), the statement applies to both low-fare airlines and major airlines. So it can't harm our argument.

0
PrepTests ·
PT129.S2.Q24
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jun 14 2020

Four simple steps! (1) Spot the new word in the conclusion: "meaning". (2) Go find "meaning" among the given answer choices: only C and E are left. (3) Eliminate by looking at the details: C is eliminated because "readers agreeing/disagreeing" is irrelevant to the argument. We care about "poem expressing contradictory ideas", not "readers expressing contradicting ideas to the author of the poem". (4) Pick your answer: E! For your conclusion to make sense, you need the readers to have a correct idea.

40
PrepTests ·
PT127.S2.Q24
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jun 14 2020

Fish XD

1
PrepTests ·
PT125.S4.Q17
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 04 2020

Are there any ways to quickly solve this type of question??

#help

1
PrepTests ·
PT125.S4.Q5
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 04 2020

Claim =/= fact !

0
PrepTests ·
PT124.S3.Q23
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Jun 04 2020

This stimulus presumes that things discussed in the stimulus are biconditional & that’s the idea that we need to find in the correct answer choice!

0
PrepTests ·
PT124.S1.Q8
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Wednesday, Jun 03 2020

I struggled so much, and now I get it.

There are two points that we can attack within the stimulus.

1) “Correlation. Therefore, causation.”

2) “If causation, X.”

A,B,C,E try to attack the second point but fail to do so because they are not relevant to our causation.

D is a correct weakener in that it attacks the first point mentioned above.

I hope this helps anyone who struggled with this seemingly challenging question!

0
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Saturday, Feb 08 2020

@ Thank you!

@ Thank you for your concern :)

1
PrepTests ·
PT154.S4.Q23
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jan 12 2020

#help

We are comparing btw "passenger in the vehicle (who) will USUALLY be quiet or even provide helpful warnings" and "driver on a cell phone" to make a conclusion that "conversing on a cell phone while driving is more dangerous than CONVERSING WITH A PASSENGER in the vehicle". So I felt (D) helps to close the gap between the premise and the conclusion by making that 'usually' to 'all'. Can someone please help? Thank you.

0
PrepTests ·
PT153.S3.Q17
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Sunday, Jan 12 2020

#help

but the stimulus doesn't say that the participants consumed lycopene through fruits and vegetables. are we assuming that people ate fruits and vegetables over the 12-year period?

2
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Monday, Nov 18 2019

@ said:

I've found that 7sage's digital format was pretty close to the actual testing experience. There was a collapse function as well as the opportunity to eliminate answer choices on the actual LSAC administered test. You can use your finger or a stylus on the actual test. I also found that the stylus/tablet was not always responsive, which was pretty frustrating during actual test. I had to switch my tablet after the break because I was not able to eliminate any answer choices (although I could select those answers if I wanted to). The second tablet I used worked much better. Good luck!

When you got a chance to swtich the tablet, did you have to restart taking the exam?

0
PrepTests ·
PT134.S2.Q25
User Avatar
donamhyun690
Thursday, Nov 07 2019

#help

Why does the correct answer look more like a SA type rather than a NA type?

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?