Doesn't AC A still support the argument, though? The dermatologist says that the rash is caused by contact with telephones, but he never gives a specific medical cause. AC A simply says it's due to allergies to the phone. Is that not a cause, therefore supporting the dermatologist?

Isnt "only" a Group 2 Necessary condition indicator? Why is the contract being put in the sufficient condition?

What about not choosing AC's that use similar content as the stimulus? Taxes for both??

I've done this question before too!!! HELP

I've seen this question before on 7sage...

I've seen this question before here... how?!

I swear they make the Drills easier than the You Try's in the actual curriculum...

I'm confused, should I use the negation technique or not, because it works every time, but JY says not to use it because it takes too long...