Hi I am interested in joining

hi im interested in joining, when is the first meeting?

All good haha, im oblivious LOL

hi not yelling this is how I take notes I capitalize what's important lol

sample to population in generalizing findings from the sample to the entire population whereas part to whole is a statement that is only true of a part of the whole does not make it true of the whole as the whole is GREATER then the sum of it parts.

sample to population would be a a study where a sample only including undergrad students u have some finding abt them and then try to generalize the findings from the undergrad students the the ENTIRE population of the university.

part to whole is saying these basketball players are the best in the league therefore the team they play for is the best team.

just because the parts of the basketball team are good does not make the whole the team itself good. the whole (the team) is MORE COMPLEX (greater) then just the individual strengths of each player it entails more than simply the players (the parts). like how well they communicate ect......

hope this helps

I understood this very differently, I always try to approach things from the simplest perspective conditionally.

this is how I understood the stem and got the ac correct

the logic of the arg is

A -> more B than C (if parking citation then MORE during the school year (students are there) THAN when no students)

A -m-> B

(if u get a parking citation then its when students are in town) (MOST)

out of the answer choices ur just looking for a premise that says if a -> more B then C that then follows with a A -MOST-> B Conclusion

same here or its the opposite u are overconfident so u do it too quickly and miss a small detail

this I how I mapped this one out

/A ->/B

A -> C

C -> B

if uneducated then weak (not strong)

if educated then government does this

if government does this then strong (not weak)

same here taking me 3 min

same here do you have any tips for getting faster at parallel analogy questions?

im getting these questions right but its taking me 3-4 min LOL

the reason why this argument is flawed is in order to reject someone else conclusion/claim you must yourself come up with YOUR OWN argument supporting WHY their conclusion is incorrect. U CAN NEVER claim on the basis that someone else claim/conclusion is wrong merely because their argument is wrong that does absolutely nothing you have not actually provided any reasoning/evidence for why your claim/ conclusion is true compared to theirs.

Hope this helps!

the way I have come to understand this type of flaw "psychological conclusion flaw" is the following:

if you are presented with a claim/conclusion mentioning:

"if other people believe X about A then they must also believe Y about A" can be flawed bc:

1. what u know vs what others know

if u are told about a certain belief people hold about something and then u are presented with a fact about that same thing U CANNOT infer that believe also believe what u just read/learned because its about the same thing.

U only know their one belief and thats it. U cannot infer another belief that someone holds just because u now know something related to the belief they hold!

2. what is IMPLIED vs. what id INFERRED

When u are told about a belief that someone holds about something and are presented with something that is implied of that very same thing U CANNOT INFER they also know believe in it just because it implied.

Just because something is implied u cannot infer that very same thing can be applied to something else merely because its implied.

I recognize this can be a bit abstract but I hope this helps!

Hi everyone!

Could someone please help me understand why answer choice E) is incorrect for an argument that has psychological flaw?

If someone could simply and plainly state why ad explain it would be much appreciates as the text lesson was unclear to me why this answer is incorrect!

Thank you!

#help

I chose b as the correct answer choice through the POE for these reasons:

1. answer choice a - talk's about a set of people we don't care about so immediately its irrelevant (mentions to WHOLE population when the survey and conclusion applies to only the constitutes)

2. answer choice c - this answer Is confusing and words, but when u acc understand it there was no evidence provided for, or against the supposed bill in the arg so it just introduces stuff that was never mentioned to begin with

3. answer choice d - attractive because its describing something but it's info is actually incorrect bc the conclusion does not restate a claim that was just purely made in the premises

4. answer choice e - attractive because it brings up stuff that was mentioned in the argument (the bill being chosen) but its wrong because again its talking about "THE PUBLIC" who tf? we only care about the constitutes. Also there was nothing mentioned about completely supporting a bill vs merely consistent w supporting a bill

this is how I understood why the other ones were wrong, I hope this helps!

#feedback #help how can I turn off the captions, there's no button on the video on my screen that allows me to switch it off, is there a shortcut on your keyboard to turn of the captions then? It's personally very distracting to me and I am not able to close them.

did not account for sorry

I originally chose c then switched to b in blind review but I understand why I was right with choosing c the first time, b is wrong because it actually DOES NOT introduce some alternative cause (alternative hypothesis) that accounted for the difference seen within the population all b did is just add more detail to the already existing cause which does not really do much because the conclusion would still be intact because the cause for mental illness symptoms differing across pl in diff countries is still due to brain compounds rather then an actual alternative hypothesis aka another variable they did account for.

can someone please provide a straightforward concrete explain as to why b is incorrect I couldn't catch exactly why its wrong for this question

@cherry641 I am not currently Abel to access anything on the platform as anything I press has the 404 ERROR. Please do let me know when this will be fixed.

Thank you for the clarification

Thank you for explaining!

I got 4/5 in timed conditions but 2 out of 5 in BR make it make sense LOL

yeah this one hurt my brain as well

wait why am finally getting it now SLAY