what? the passage doesn't say there is no path, just no particular path. And the conclusion is about order / temporal dimension not that it follows no path? so how is E right? #help

@michelinka1232 yea u right.

im gonna eat sleep for dinner

for people confused about C, the ants do not use pheromones to navigate between food because they literally can't. It's not saying they dont try, or they don't make pheromones anyways. just that it wont work.

broo people with a 180 got a 50% chance of getting this right 😭😭😭😭

@faizcon also i've never seen an argument on the LSAT be wrong for being subjective as opposed to the logic. Anybody know where the invalid argument form ls? I guess thats not even related tho..

first time i see something with no comments zamn

What was your score at first?

I assumed A was restating the premise. But now that I notice, no answer to a NA question does that. Unless I am mistaken.

Anyone else think B was too strong AKA sufficient not necessary?

I get D is the right answer, but B doesn't even undermine the stimulus? So what if they make more trips, that doesn't slow down revenue or prove there isn't ticket sharing.

@faizcon and how could D be true, if the premises are true? it would have to be between 0-2? A proves the premises can be false in that circumstance, but not D.

@faizcon Also what is even the thermometer measuring? both plants? Just the air? Confusing.

how is A not correct? yes it mentions blossoms of rhododendrons, but it still mentions that crocuses don't bloom more than a few weeks each year. Meaning there is a possibility that the temperature is above 2 degrees, but it's simply not that time of year so it doesn't blossom. Am i missing something? #help

The reason why these quesitons are hard is because the reverse is usually not true. What I mean is that, if the question was "do these strenghten?" they would be wrong, because you would have to make leaps and assumptions for these answer choices to work.

But if "everyone knows that no book can deliver", doesn't that mean there is no possibility that someone will act as if the claim is true? Shoudn't you assume the premise is true even if it's an exaggeration?

I thought phantom meant like planes with a cloaking device, not planes that don't exist. Why would they word it like this?? Am I alone?