Seems that this is my biggest weakness when I look back on why I'm missing questions on LR and RC. I'm really struggling to fully process the arguments without missing the smaller details. Like 70% of the questions I'm getting wrong on LR are mostly from missed details, the others being not properly I.Ding the argument and not understanding the abstract language in some ACs.
Any tips for getting better at reading for detail? Obviously an important quality to have in law, but I've always been a big picture reader/thinker rather than a detailed oriented person, so it's a hard transition for me to make.
This problem of mine is really exacerbated in the I.D the disagreement questions. I'm terrible at figuring out what word was misunderstood and what the two disagree about, since the questions require you to understand all of the more detailed implications of the two arguments.
I don't really see the median scores coming down with all the high-scoring hold-overs who will be reapplying in the upcoming cycles. LSAT needs to restructure the test or something to re-establish the curve, but the caveat is that they can't do that since it'll screw over all of the previous scores.
ugh. What a fucking headache. LSAT really fucked up with the pandemic and 3-section format.
LR, arguably the most important section in regards to testing for a law skillset go reduced to 1/3 as compared to 1/2 of the exam, and the smaller number of questions creates a greater margin of error for people to guess their way to a higher score than they're used to. Scores can vary by 8~ points in the 75 section format, which I really hate.