happy others also thought this.

For these type of questions is it a 100% provable statement?

this question was just cruel!

I was drawn to D because it does mention that has surface movement t like earth so I was like okay this movement lets heat get out but I can not assume that!

this question really got me how is D not correct and I am supposed to just know it does not matter

Watch out for "Degree Shift / Absolute Conclusion" traps:

• Premise: We didn't do something to a huge degree (e.g., didn't cause great suffering).

• Flawed Conclusion: Therefore, we didn't do it at all (e.g., caused no suffering).

When an author turns a premise about scale/amount into an absolute conclusion of zero, look for an answer choice like Choice B that points out the failure to prove the absolute claim.

guys what is SHODDY like shawty??

was my first thought

I really wanted C to be right I felt like it was adding to the reasons to strengthen the argument but then again the club mentioned Jackie could have never even gone there and choice A it directly connects her preference for Moral Vacuum to this new album by bringing in the exact key person responsible for the musical arrangements she loves!

In formal, legal, or LSAT contexts, to patronize a business means to frequent it as a customer or give it your business.

I am not sure if anyone else made this mistake, but I was drawn to A because the author wrote "solid grasp of the basic concepts and investigatory techniques in a subject, they will be able to explore the breadth of that subject" in my mind animal classification which bridges into learning how plants and animals can be useful was more on point than repeating learning about on Greek Tragedy helps you learn about other ones. But I know now Choice (D) staying within "Greek tragedy" is actually what makes it so safe! The educators' rule specifically says that mastering core basics in a subject lets you explore the breadth of that subject.

note to self "lapse" simply means a memory failure

it took me a while to get this one but the way i am doing it is only looking at the last sentence and then saying what supports just this last sentence - idk if that will always work tho

so basically the author is writing a stimulus

then it ill be questioned by the question stem and then answers

to play piano you must be able to read musical notes. Therefore all who can read musical notes play piano --not valid

so can many also mean all?

subset: student at harvard

superset: student

Being a student is necessary to being a student at Harvard

But it is not necessary to be a student at harvard to be a student

so basically to be cat you do not necessarily have to be fat. but in order to be a fat cat it is necessary to be a cat

premise is setting up for the conclusion to be supported