I would like to join too! stuck at 171

I see I think I was confused and picked B because I didn't like that E assumed they would sell to her and not someone else if they were forced to sell at all. But I see now that the "only" in reference to their refusal forecloses the possibility that they would not sell to her just cause they don't like her or for whatever reason

A note for the admin. The question 10 answer is highly irresponsible for students and should be removed. Charles is the exception to the rule. As the answer states, and you correctly agree, we cannot validly argue that his charges are false as simply establishing that he's the exception cannot trigger an alternate conclusion without additional information. But your answer should have stopped there; continuing to speculate is counterproductive. The LSAT itself would find your inference invalid and flimsy as Charles could have just as easily thought he was paid to drive the car because Ray wanted to sell it to someone stateside and couldn't transport it himself. YOU are bringing assumptions outside of the stimulus that are irresponsible and confusing to test takers. Please remove this answer and replace it with one focused on how the LSAT would actually treat a stimulus like this

I think the more appropriate analogy would be "Adam seems happy to most," it being implied that he does not seem happy to some. If the statement was "Tom's recipe is easy to follow" that would just be a statement of fact, but the inclusion of 'for most' implies that it was not easy to follow for some

For the drills specifically practice getting them all right in however long that takes you before trying to get faster. The drills are meant to solidify your understanding in the question types and answer choices and once you have that foundation you can practice speed on the prep tests