.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@ Thank you again! Such a life saver!
@ Thank you for your advice! I'm curious about negative effects of propanolol. Have you tried it before taking the real test? Would it give you a headache, nausea, or something like that?
Wow I really want to know what happened to this person. But a 167 for diagnostic? It could probably end up with a 180.
Where can I buy a JY's brain so I can take it with me to the real test
Everyone seems has a consensus that a break would do a favor, but for me, study break makes my points go down all the time... and it also takes me some time come back to where I was. Wired situation. :/
Hi JY, it's really helpful to see you doing the real test! And thank you for your honesty to share your mistakes with us haha. It's good to fell "oh I'm not alone" sometimes :)
Love Woody Allen too, but I only heard Manhattan in this one ;/
Thanks Nicole!
According to LSAC's new rule, all PDF version was wiped out. See this link
https://classic.7sage.com/forums/discussion/7062/cambridge-bites-the-dust
Wow someone said after googling it the sculpture turns out to be a disappointment. Guess what? I just googled Isamu Noguchi coffee table and it's insanely expensive.
(New Preptest 78 reading comp: Isamu Noguchi and his amazing coffee table) haha
As a wolverine I'm so glad to see Michigan Law jumped up. Go blue!
Haha I know, that's insane and super inspiring!
You can find JY doing LR in PT69 S1+S4, and PT71 S1+S3. And Jon also had an epic timed LR section video, which took him only 19 minutes.
Ohhh I finally got it.
So the question stem is saying: saving more life → GNP increases → income tax increases
Then we could see that there is a gap between "saving more life" and "GNP increases". If all the people who had been saved are kids or retired elders, then GNP would not increase. Therefore, since GNP increases, our NA is "net increase in employment."
I switch to A in BR, but I still don't like this answer choice. It seems that LSAC wants us to assume that contorted positions are caused by poison, and with that assumption A makes much more sense. But I guess POE would be the best approach for this quesion since other choices are just so irrelevant.
If anyone is interested in fancy camera you should check out the Polaroid cube haha
http://www.amazon.com/Polaroid-Lifestyle-Action-Camera-Stabilization/dp/B011OUS97K/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1457210170&sr=8-4&keywords=polaroid
I don't really like answer choice A because I feel that we have to make the assumption that people have more pressure when the waiting drivers were more impatient. Maybe someone just doesn't have any pressure regardless of how impatient the waiting drivers are...
In spite of that, C still fails to explain the time difference between the two waiting scenarios. So I guess that makes A the best choice.
wow the answer choice A in question 13, such a luring bait. It's so consistent with my intuition.
"may be beating them when they got the number wrong" hahaha a good way to learn LSAT as well
This questions was like WTF? I eliminate E because I think it's should be a perfect answer for sufficient assumption questions rather than necessary.
Why not? I know NYU takes average LSAT scores seriously, but according to threads I read, other schools seem care less about average scores. One thing I know for sure is that when LSAC delivering your grades, the average score appears anyway.
Seriously for someone has the most trouble with law passages like me, I think reading law reviews would be really helpful. I only checked Yale Law Review but I guess most of them are freebies online. Another thing that I think is really helpful is my American Constitutional History class, and reading materials are just on the topic. Unlike many people, I've never struggled with science passages, and I think the reason is that as a BS major I just read so many things about science in my whole life. Backgrounds definitely help.
JY can we have videos for Critical Analysis please? Burden is on you :P
After taking 20ish PTs and review this lesson, I have to say that there are only three weakening questions I can remember directly attack the premise. So I guess keep the idea in mind that sometimes attacking the premise is allowed would be helpful.