- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I got tripped up on this question and wrote out a conditional statement because I saw 'only'. Is it safe to assume that we should be mindful of group 1-4 when tackling MBT questions?
I'm still having trouble understanding how increasing the habitat was included in the conditional statement. Can someone help me out?
So essentially, we just want to isolate the subject and predicate and pay less attention to the 7 parts of speech aka the modifiers?
It would be nice if I could have a PDF version of the web map shown in the summary video to help study and review in the future.
When quickly running through an argument like this on the test is it ok to label concession and context as the same thing?
Is it safe to say that would should eliminate any new info outside of the passage in our answer choices?
Is it safe to say that our POE should be to eliminate new information?
I was able to quickly identify the conclusion, but I'm not sure if I should keep reading through the entire stimulus. If I'm confident in my choice should I look at my answer choices or keep reading to be safe?
What helped me to understand this is looking at the visuals and telling myself necessary conditions starts with the superset, or an outer circle, and works its way in and sufficient starts with the subset, or an inner circle, and works its way out.