- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
It says hardcover sales of other books, not being literature, make the literature books, which they assume are hard cover, go down in sales. if I understand correctly, C is right because it offers an alternative explanation for the conclusion. The rise of books and decrease in literary ones could not be attributed to sales of hardcovers if the literary books were never hardcovers to begin with, since they say HARDCOVERS are the books impacted by sales. Not paperbacks.
C is wrong because bats may not be included in most animals.
B is right because rabid bats are scarier than normal bats. Rabid ones aren't shy, so it doesn't count as justification.
ohhh e is wrong cause the Max doesn't increase, just the way to get to the max becomes different when it's windier.
D is wrong because it is talking about earth, so we'd have to assume that it applies to Venus. We also don't know how long "past" is and whether it would be included in AC saying "years".
A is right because it weakens the argument by giving a reason for why the conclusion can be wrong. It adds an element of a loophole is how I see it.
A is wrong cause it's too broad. we don't know second arguments Stan on it.
I think for D to be right it would have to say that taller doesn't cause outperformance bc outperformance can cause ppl to be taller lol. could be wrong but it's my interpretation of the right setup.
Yes I did this and am so happy lol. I think it helps to get a feel of what will be important. In this case, I figured it would be "ONLY THOSE who are highly successful...blah blah," because it's pretty strict language.
B right cause if they can't provide basis for treatment decisions then they can't get the treatment and it won't be more beneficial.
"at least sometimes" is good language indicator in a question like this.
I confused "any of its explicit rules" with meaning the same as "ANY of its explicit rules routinely". I didn't notice routinely so could not understand the answers. routinely is not the same as any. they're flawed for throwing any in the first sentence though... so tricky. need to read so carefully on this.
totally didn't click that on the job number and rates weren't the same. ugh such a basic overlook
E cause Cynthia wants to fund those that seek it. Luis says only the ones that ensure it.
literally bro. these were the 2 i got wrong it's so annoying. i've been trying to find more ppl doing 7sage with similar problems rn and you're the first person i've seen active in the comments lol. if this notifies your email you should respond to my comment with your socials, let's connect!
ohhh that makes so much more sense for the last sentence of passage B. I thought it meant present as in right now in society i was so confused. i get it now, it should be more specific that by present they mean present time during the article though lol. kinda flawed
said E unfortunately. it's wrong cause it doesn't impact the conclusion. they can voice more and still be against reducing more.
exactly what my issue was. let me know (reply to me) if anyone figured it out please!
I got this right (yay) but flagged it. I nearly went with B and it's super tricky. I'm pretty surprised I got this actually lol. That being said, B is wrong because of the assumption being made. B is assuming truth in the flawed assumption that if you are the dependent you are motivated by snobbery. Just because you are motivated by snobbery, it is saying the passage doesn't consider you are motivated by something else too. But, they did not assume this. The fact that you're motivated by snobbery alone should not be accepted and is the flaw. Just because you are a dependent of blah blah doesn't mean you automatically have bad motivation. That's what D says.
I'm patting my back right now I feel like I actually made sense. huge W
yes! i thought it meant other as in apart from the objects it clashes with
ahh i didnt realize with B that the premise is preventing weight gain whereas the AC is getting rid of it ughh